复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
Your landlord kept your deposit.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
Your landlord kept your deposit. Your mom got a medical bill that makes no sense. You got laid off on a Tuesday. Someone you love died, and no one handed you the checklist.
Generic AI gives you filler for the moments that matter most. PM Skills gives your AI the exact framework a senior professional would use — for 1,117 real tasks, across work and life.
🍼 New parent · 💼 Just laid off · 🌍 New to this country · 👵 Caring for a parent · 🕊️ Losing someone · 💸 Money in crisis · 🔑 Starting over · 🤖 Getting serious about AI
PM Skills is an open-source library of 1174 Agent Skills — plain-markdown SKILL.md files that teach an AI assistant to do one professional task to a senior professional's standard, from writing a PRD to decoding a lease or running a blameless postmortem. Each skill bundles the framework, an output template, quality checks, and anti-patterns. It is MIT-licensed and works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, and Codex.
Decode a lease before you sign it. Write a PRD your team can execute. Simulate the promotion committee before the real one meets. Check the weather with zero API keys. Generic AI gives you filler; these give you the structure a senior professional actually uses.
Works natively in Claude Code and Hermes Agent, with ready-to-paste exports for ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Codex and 8 more tools. (PM stands for Professional, not just Product Management.)
/plugin, search pm-skills, install. Done — ask "decode this lease" and watch.npx pm-claude-skills add and pick your tool from the menu (Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, ChatGPT, Gemini…).Nothing here can scare your setup. A skill is a markdown file your AI reads — no runtime, no telemetry, no accounts. Installing copies text files; uninstalling is deleting them. Skeptical? Good instinct: read one first — it's designed to be read by humans too.
Don't know what to look for? Describe your task in plain words at 🔎 find — "my landlord kept my deposit", "board meeting on Thursday" — and it names the skill.
Never miss a new skill. New ones drop regularly — subscribe to the newsletter and get a short email with a real example whenever they launch. No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Prefer no email? Follow via RSS or browse the newsletter archive.
Most skills here answer "do this task." A new family answers "think differently about my life."
LLMs have one big weakness: they're too correct. On open-ended questions they give the safe, average, textbook answer — technically right and completely forgettable. Two new bundles fight that head-on (inspired by parallel-divergent-ideation research):
💭 pm-thinking — think betterEscape the generic answer and stress-test your own decisions:
|
🎯 pm-focus — get unstuckADHD-friendly executive function (useful for everyone):
|
It's not just a folder of files — the whole library is explorable, runnable, and a little bit magic. All of this runs in your browser, free, nothing to install:
▶ Pick a skill → fill a short form → run it → a senior-grade artifact streams out. No install, your key stays in your browser (or run free with no key).
🌌 Galaxy 3D — fly through all 1174 skills as a living constellation. The ones you've run burn brighter. |
🎁 Wrapped — your practice, as a shareable story. 100% local — nothing leaves your browser. |
▶ Open the Playground to run any of the 1174 skills with your own key — or just browse them all.
Anything below is a real ask that activates a real skill — say it in your own words, the description does the routing:
| 🏠 "decode this lease before I sign" → lease-decoder | 📋 "write the PRD for our referral feature" → prd-template | 🚨 "blameless postmortem for Friday's outage" → incident-postmortem |
| 💰 "practice my salary negotiation" → salary-negotiation | 📉 "why is churn up this quarter?" → churn-analysis | ⚖️ "rank the backlog with RICE" → rice-prioritisation |
| 🛂 "prep me for the visa interview" → the-visa-interview | 🔨 "is this contractor quote fair?" → home-contractor-quote-decoder | 🏡 "should we rent or buy?" → rent-vs-buy |
| 📝 "draft my self-review honestly" → performance-review | 🚀 "are we ready to launch?" → product-launch-checklist | 📬 "my inbox is 4,000 deep" → email-triage-system |
…all 1174 asks live in the catalog.
| You want to… | Do this |
|---|---|
| Browse the skills | SKILLS.md — the full catalog · or the searchable web catalog |
| Install in Claude Code | /plugin → search pm-skills (it's in the official Anthropic directory) — or npx pm-claude-skills add --agent claude |
| Install in Cursor / Codex / Windsurf / Cline… | npx pm-claude-skills add --agent cursor (or codex, windsurf, aider, cline, zed…) |
| Use one skill in ChatGPT / Gemini | Copy it from exports/chatgpt/ or exports/gemini/ and paste as instructions |
| Skills over MCP, in any session | claude mcp add pm-skills -- npx -y pm-claude-skills-mcp |
No npm install needed — npx pm-claude-skills … always runs the latest. npx pm-claude-skills list shows everything in your terminal. Full per-tool instructions: docs/installation.md.
Every skill follows the same discipline: what it produces, the inputs it needs, a real framework (severity scales, decision rules — not vibes), a concrete output template, quality checks, and anti-patterns. All 1174 pass the SkillSpec L3 gate and a security audit in CI.
| Decoders | Simulators | Calculators | Live data | Cowork | Tokens | Seatbelt | Essentials |
Browse all 1,099 → · try one in your browser →
| Family | What it does | Examples (of many) |
|---|---|---|
| 🔍 Decoders (25+) | Read the document before you sign it — plain language, 🔴🟡🟢 severity, the money math | lease · medical bill · job offer · severance · insurance policy · contractor quote · timeshare |
| 🎭 Simulators | Face the adversary early — the real meeting, then an out-of-character debrief | salary negotiation · promotion committee · thesis defense · visa interview · due-diligence call |
| 🧮 Calculators | Deterministic Python scripts + honest models — assumptions labeled, no false precision | rent vs buy · FIRE number · debt payoff · raise vs jump · daycare vs stay-home |
| 📡 Live data (17) | Real-time answers with zero API keys — weather, rates, flights, scores, all over plain curl | weather · currency · crypto · flights · earthquakes · is-it-down |
| 🏠 Life admin | The unglamorous logistics, done in order | relocation · new parent · caregiving · doctor visits · records requests |
| 💼 Career moments | The weeks that decide years | layoff kit · resignation kit · PIP response · first 90 days as manager · interview gauntlet |
| 🏛 Dead mentors (5) 🆕 | History's sharpest operators, resurrected — the real methods from public-domain classics, applied to modern work | Machiavelli on office politics · Sun Tzu on picking your fights · Franklin's decision algebra · Marcus Aurelius on bad days · Bennett's 1908 time audit |
| 🏛 Life systems (20) 🆕 | Navigating the bureaucracies and emergencies people face alone — civic, disability, immigration, disaster | voting-navigator · disability-benefit-appeal · arrival-setup · credential-recognition · go-bag-builder · after-the-disaster |
| 🧠 Human edges (20) 🆕 | The parts of life nobody built tools for — neurodivergence, invisible illness, grief, identity, the hard conversations | masking-budget · spoon-planner · diagnosis-limbo-kit · coming-out-rehearsal · grief-admin · rabbit-hole-rescue |
| ⚡ New-gen (10) 🆕 | How the next generation lives and earns — creator deals, clips, D&D, ranked, resale, the attention war | creator-deal-decoder · clip-factory · ttrpg-session-forge · the-vibe-check · ranked-climb-coach · attention-reset |
| 🔮 2027 (10) 🆕 | Problems you don't have yet, but will — the agent era's operational skills | agent-severance · deepfake-drill · agent-hiring-panel · context-bankruptcy · clone-brief · api-for-yourself · the-org-simulator |
| 🎲 Tabletop (5) 🆕 | Game night, upgraded — teach, judge, plan, design, and practice the trades | teach-the-game · rules-lawyer · game-night-planner · board-game-designer · tabletop-negotiator |
| 🧾 Freelance & renters & parents | Small bundles for specific lives | pricing your services · late invoices · deposit recovery · IEP meetings · students |
| 🎲 Hobbies (12) 🆕 | Life outside work — the genuinely fun stuff | wine pairing · houseplant care · board-game night · D&D campaign · stargazing · chess openings |
| 💪 Wellbeing (12) 🆕 | Body and mind, sustainably — not another app streak | home workout · sleep reset · habit builder · posture reset · screen-time detox |
| 🔐 Digital self-defense (12) 🆕 | When your digital life is under attack | identity-theft recovery · phishing triage · account recovery · data-broker removal · doxxing response |
| 👪 Family & relationships (12) 🆕 | The people who matter | new-baby logistics · wedding vows · co-parenting messages · condolences · in-law boundaries |
| 💭 Thinking modes (24) 🆕 | Change how your AI reasons — escape the generic answer, stress-test decisions | the-third-answer · five-minds · decision-panel · red-team-my-plan · devils-advocate · poke-holes-in-this |
| 🎯 Focus & executive function (26) 🆕 | Get unstuck and run your own brain — ADHD-friendly, for everyone | where-do-i-start · task-to-first-step · overwhelm-triage · the-one-thing · build-my-memory-file · weekly-unstuck |
| 📖 Learning & mastery (10) 🆕 | Learn anything faster and make it stick | learn-anything-roadmap · feynman-explainer · spaced-repetition-setup · skill-plateau-breaker · deliberate-practice-plan |
| 💰 Wealth-building (10) 🆕 | Build wealth on purpose — educational, not financial advice | investing-for-beginners · index-fund-starter · ask-for-a-raise · first-100k-plan · financial-independence-roadmap |
| 📑 Investing literacy (5) 🆕 | Read a company's accounts before you believe its highlights — every figure page-referenced; educational, not financial advice | annual-report-tutor · audited-boundary-check · profit-to-cash-walk · company-compare-same-definitions · investing-vocabulary-explainer |
| 🤝 Social & relationships (10) 🆕 | The hard conversations and the human ones | make-friends-as-an-adult · networking-for-introverts · boundary-setting-scripts · give-hard-feedback-kindly · repair-after-a-fight |
| 🩺 Caregiving & aging (10) 🆕 | Care for aging parents and navigate the system — not medical/legal advice | medical-appointment-advocate · care-team-coordinator · caregiver-burnout-check · long-term-care-options · end-of-life-wishes-conversation |
| 🤖 AI-native life (10) 🆕 | Use AI itself well — the meta-skills that make every tool better | prompt-library-builder · delegate-to-ai · ai-context-primer · spot-ai-mistakes · get-more-from-ai |
| 🤝 Cowork (100) | The office knowledge work an AI coworker actually does — the frameworks — the whole bundle | email triage · spreadsheet audit · meeting cost meter · deck outline first · saying no kindly · delegation brief |
| ⚡ Cowork · Live (12) | The same jobs, done — Claude Cowork acts on your real data via connectors + sandbox and returns an artifact — the whole bundle | inbox triage (live) · meeting prep (live) · spreadsheet audit (live) · deck from doc · thread → decision · PR description (live) |
…plus HR, sales, operations, research, healthcare, educators, writers, social media, and more — the full profession index, or by bundle in plugins/ (131 bundles). Install any bundle: /plugin install pm-decoders@pm-skills.
Before installing anyone's skills (including these): skill-vetting — a security read for SKILL.md files. The library's own standard lives in SKILLSPEC.md; every skill's level is enforced in CI.
A skill is a single markdown file with a name, a description that tells the assistant when to activate it, and a body containing the working framework: required inputs, decision rules or severity scales, a concrete output template, quality checks, and anti-patterns. The assistant reads it and gains the judgment; humans can read, audit, and edit the same file. No runtime, no lock-in.
---
name: lease-decoder
description: "Decode a residential lease into plain English and rank the
clauses that can hurt you. Use when someone asks 'what am I signing'…"
---
## Framework: Severity Scale
- 🔴 Can cost you real money — auto-renewal into a full new term, break
penalties beyond re-rental costs, deposit conditions written to fail…
That's the whole trick: it's markdown. Your agent reads it and gains the judgment; you can read it too, audit it, edit it, or write your own. No lock-in, no runtime, no telemetry.
The pm-tokens bundle optimizes every stage of your agent's token journey — no API keys, stdlib Python, nothing leaves your machine. Five habits, typically 30–60% off a session's token flow:
# 1. Map the repo instead of reading it (~3% of the cost of reading everything)
python3 skills/repo-map/scripts/repo_map.py .
# 2. Crush bulk before it enters context (98% smaller on uniform JSON; errors always survive)
python3 skills/context-crusher/scripts/context_crush.py --mode json --file response.json
# 3. Measure what anything costs — at YOUR prices, times YOUR call volume
python3 skills/token-cost/scripts/token_cost.py --file CLAUDE.md --price-in 3 --calls 200
Plus the judgment skills: token-diet (output costs 3–5× input — diet it where safe), context-budget (cache-aware layout: stable first, volatile last), and session-handoff (resume at ~5% of transcript size). See your own breakdown in the 🪙 Token Dashboard — paste what rides in your context, get computed per-piece savings, all in-browser. The full how-to: docs/SAVE-TOKENS.md.
The pm-cowork bundle is 100 skills for the office work an AI coworker actually does. Install it (/plugin install pm-cowork@pm-skills), then — the whole trick — describe your mess, don't name the skill: say "my inbox is 4,000 deep", "nobody reads my status updates", "this spreadsheet came from someone who left" — the right skill activates on the ask.
Start where it hurts:
| Your pain | Say this | The skill that answers |
|---|---|---|
| Drowning in email | "triage my inbox and cut the volume at the source" | email-triage-system → inbox-unsubscribe-purge |
| Calendar is all meetings | "audit my recurring meetings and price them" | standing-meeting-audit + meeting-cost-meter |
| Inherited a scary spreadsheet | "audit this sheet before we trust it" | spreadsheet-audit → formula-detangler |
| Docs get rewritten in review | "outline first, get sign-off, then draft" | outline-before-prose |
| Weeks just happen to you | "set up my weekly review" | weekly-review-ritual — the hub the others plug into |
Three habits that compound: (1) The weekly review is the keystone — it feeds task-triage-matrix, deep-work-blocking, and personal-wip-limits automatically. (2) The skills chain on purpose — email-to-tasks feeds the task triage; the meeting audit feeds async-instead; delegation-brief hands off what the triage says to shed — follow the links inside each skill. (3) Teams adopt one norm at a time — start with agenda-or-cancel or working-agreements, let it stick, then add the next; the ten-norms-on-Monday rollout is how none of them survive.
Two CLI tools for the trust-and-cost problems the ecosystem keeps hand-waving — both keyless-to-inspect, both one command:
# Does your skill actually work? Prove it. Paired A/B — skill on vs off, same tasks,
# REAL token counts from the API's usage fields, optional blind judge, sha-pinned receipt.
npx pm-claude-skills prove --skill ./my-skill --tasks tasks.txt --runs 2 --judge
npx pm-claude-skills prove --skill ./my-skill --tasks tasks.txt --dry-run # plan + call count, spends nothing
# Your MCP servers are charging you rent. Measure it: per-server token cost,
# unused-in-N-days flags, "disconnect these three, save X tokens per message".
npx pm-claude-skills mcp-audit --connect
prove exists because the ecosystem is full of "65% better!" claims and almost none are measured — it's the honest-broker harness (the JetBrains "advertised 65%, measured 8.5%" story is exactly why). mcp-audit reads your Claude configs, speaks real MCP to each server to count its schema tokens, and scans your session logs for what you actually use. See also the 📊 AI Spend page — every agent's cost (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot) in one meter, all in-browser.
Agent safety: the pm-seatbelt bundle is the pre-flight checklist before an agent touches email, the browser, or files — least-privilege reviews, prompt-injection spotting, and the blast-radius drill for going autonomous. And RFC 0002 — HANDOFF.md is a dead-simple session-handoff convention (your agent, but it remembers Monday) — a file, not a server, with reference hooks.
The library grew an ecosystem — all optional, all linked from the full showcase:
📄 The one-page cheatsheet — the whole library on one printable poster · ▶ Skill Playground — try any skill in your browser, no install · 📸 the Gallery — the creative side, in screenshots · Anti-Pattern Museum — 2,900+ shareable rules · The Handbook (also a real printed book) · Workflow recipes · Subagents & slash commands · MCP server + REST API · n8n / Slack / Obsidian integrations · The Boardroom · SkillBench · Org Edition · 🇪🇸 🇫🇷 🇨🇳 🇯🇵 translations
The validator that keeps these 1,099 honest, as a GitHub Action:
- uses: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills@v76
with:
path: .claude/skills # optional — it finds them otherwise
It checks frontmatter, the Use when … trigger clause a model actually matches
on, leftover template text, and structure — and annotates each finding inline
on the pull request diff, because a finding on the line beats a finding in a
log nobody opens. Also available as npx pm-claude-skills skillcheck.
Zero dependencies, no Docker image, no model call.
A skill can tell a model to check the contrast. Only arithmetic can actually check it. Where a question has a right answer rather than a good one, the skill calls out to a tool instead of estimating — both are MIT, zero-dependency, and neither makes a model call, so they cost nothing to run and return the same answer every time.
notugly — design systems that are
provably not ugly. #777777 on white is 4.478 and fails AA; #767676 is 4.542
and passes, and no amount of looking at a screenshot separates those.
accessibility-audit, design-system-audit, design-handoff-brief,
brand-guidelines and the Figma reviews now fill their contrast rows from
npx notugly; the MCP server exposes check_contrast directly; and
design-system-generate wraps it for the case
where there is no design system and something ships on Thursday.
rulebook — 37 games, 203
rulings, and how commonly each house rule is actually played.
board-game-night-planner uses it for teach
times and for settling the argument, because a rules disagreement is usually two
groups who learned it differently and are both partly right.
v76.2.1 — SkillCheck as a GitHub Action, and the design skills now compute their contrast numbers instead of estimating them.
Everything else is in the changelog and the releases — a README should say what this is, not what it was.
Add a skill via PR (the standard, CONTRIBUTING), request one via issue, or publish your own repo to the community index and earn the badge. Translations follow the pattern in skills-i18n/.
If a skill saved you real money or a real mistake, star the repo — it's how others find it. Sponsors fund the playground's free runs and get naming rights, not influence: become a sponsor.
Individuals sponsor via GitHub Sponsors. Organisations interested in a sponsored logo + link: email me about a clearly-disclosed placement in this section — that's the whole arrangement: a logo and link only, never product integration or a product endorsement. I keep full editorial independence and may decline any sponsor whose product conflicts with users' interests.
MIT — use them, fork them, ship them at work. Skills are judgment, and judgment wants to be free.
Built by Mohit with Claude. 1174 skills · 131 bundles · 35 professions · every commit gated. The long version of this README — every feature, wave, and frontier bet — lives in the Showcase.
name: annual-report-tutor
description: "Use when asked to walk me through an annual report, teach me to read this 10-K, explain a company's accounts to a beginner, or tutor me on the financial statements in an uploaded report. Walks a beginner up a fixed six-rung ladder — statement map, balance sheet line by line, operating profit to free cash flow, five sector-appropriate ratios with healthy ranges, the sceptical read, then a reusable checklist and a five-question quiz. Produces a page-referenced tutorial in which every figure cites the page it came from and anything missing is marked 'not disclosed in this report'. Educational, not financial advice."Teaches a beginner to read one real annual report, rung by rung, with every number traced to a page. The document is the only source of truth: the skill reads, it never remembers or estimates.
(p. N). A figure without a page is a defect.£m, $ thousands) and never convert silently.Output exactly:
| Statement | Starts on page | Period covered | The question it answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement (P&L) | p. N | FY.. | Did the business make a profit this year? |
| Balance sheet | p. N | at DD Mon YYYY | What does it own and owe on one day? |
| Cash flow statement | p. N | FY.. | Where did cash actually come from and go? |
Then three single lines: the auditor's report starts on p. N; the notes to the accounts start on p. N; the pages the audit opinion says it covers are pp. N–M (or "not disclosed in this report"). Close with the prompt: "Open the balance sheet page. Tell me the first line you don't understand."
Output exactly one table covering every line on the primary balance sheet, in the report's order:
| Line (as printed) | Page | This year | Last year | Plain-English meaning |
|---|
Then The five lines that matter most, chosen for the sector (default: cash and equivalents; total borrowings including lease liabilities; trade receivables; inventories, or deferred revenue/contract liabilities for software; total equity). For each, three fixed fields:
(p. N), this year vs last year, with the change.Then The two lines beginners misread, always these two unless the sector demands a substitute, in the same three-field format plus a fourth, What it is not:
(p. N).Prompt: "Which of the five lines moved most, and can you find the note that explains why?"
Output the walk as one table, working shown, with the running total on every row:
| Step | Line item | Page | Amount | Running total | Why cash and profit diverge here (one sentence) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Operating profit (statutory) | p. N | Starting point — accounting profit, not cash | ||
| 2 | + Depreciation and amortisation | p. N | Non-cash charges added back | ||
| 3 | ± Working capital movements | p. N | Sales not yet collected, stock built, bills not yet paid | ||
| 4 | ± Other non-cash and provisions | p. N | Share-based pay, impairments, provisions | ||
| 5 | − Tax paid | p. N | Cash tax differs from the tax charge | ||
| 6 | − Interest paid (if in operating) | p. N | Note where the report classifies it | ||
| 7 | = Cash from operations | p. N | Must tie to the cash flow statement figure | ||
| 8 | − Capital expenditure (PP&E and intangibles) | p. N | Investment is spent cash but not an expense | ||
| 9 | − Lease payments (principal) | p. N | Under IFRS 16 these sit in financing | ||
| 10 | = Free cash flow | The skill's definition; state if the company's own FCF differs |
Under the table, three fixed lines: Tie-out: row 7 equals the reported cash from operations (p. N) — yes/no, and the gap if no. Company's own FCF: amount (p. N) and how its definition differs, or "not disclosed in this report". Your check: name one subtraction (e.g. step 8) and instruct the learner to recompute it by hand before moving on. Prompt: "Recompute step [n] yourself. Does it match?"
State the sector and how the report confirms it (p. N). Pick the five-ratio set from this menu and output one table:
| Ratio | Formula | Inputs (page each) | Result | Healthy range for this sector | This company sits |
|---|
Sector menus (healthy ranges are rules of thumb; label them so):
Any ratio with a not-disclosed input is shown as not computable. Prompt: "Which ratio would you want a second year of before trusting it?"
Output two columns, minimum four rows each, every cell with a page:
| What the numbers show (page) | What is narrative (page) |
|---|
Rules: audited statements and notes go left; highlights, chairman's statement, CEO review, KPIs, "adjusted" and "underlying" figures go right. Then Three questions a sceptic asks, each tied to a specific page, and one line naming the biggest gap between the story and the statements. Prompt: "Pick one narrative claim. Which audited line would prove or disprove it?"
One-page checklist (reusable on any report), exactly twelve items, each a yes/no with a blank for a page number:
Five-question quiz, answers withheld: each question names the page range to look in. Reveal an answer only after the learner attempts it; then give the answer with the page and one sentence on the misread if they were wrong. Question types: one locate-a-figure, one compute-a-ratio, one why-cash-differs, one is-it-audited, one what-would-you-check-next.
Each rung is headed ## Rung N — [title] and contains only the tables and fixed fields defined above, in that order, followed by the rung prompt in italics. The artifact ends, verbatim: "Educational, not financial advice. Decisions with real money belong with a regulated adviser."
(p. N) — pass/failprofit-to-cash-walk (Rung 3 standalone), audited-boundary-check (Rung 5 deep dive), company-compare-same-definitions (two reports), investing-vocabulary-explainer (any term, in context).
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!