复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform. The canonical layer is harness-free by construction; Claude Code is currently the verified-native harness. Other harnesses remain engineering candidates until their native-path integration is verified; source research alone is never presented as public support.
Version semantics: the release badge is this marketplace's display version. npm packages, including the
ccpiCLI and publishable plugins, retain their own package versions; they are intentionally not expected to equal the display version. The version-surface checker governs the display surfaces without rewriting package semver.
Inside Claude Code, one command installs the whole marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins
Or use the CLI:
pnpm add -g @intentsolutionsio/ccpi
ccpi install devops-automation-pack
Browse the marketplace · Explore plugins · Download bundles
Killer Skill of the Week — no-ai-slop by Peter Yang
Strip AI slop from any draft — named-pattern edits that keep the writer's real voice
no-ai-slop does two jobs and refuses to fake a third. In Edit mode it makes the minimum effective edit — cutting throat-clearing, weak verbs, and abstract nouns while deliberately preserving the writer's cadence, bluntness, humor, and honest admissions, so a rough draft still sounds like the same person afterward. In Detect mode it names each AI-slop pattern it finds, quotes the offending line, and gives the fix in a few words — and pointedly does NOT score the draft or guess whether an AI wrote it. That restraint is the whole point: AI detectors guess; named patterns are evidence the reader can check. MIT-licensed, single focused skill, actively maintained by Peter Yang.
"AI detectors guess. Named patterns are evidence the user can check." — Peter Yang
Grade: A | Week of July 22, 2026 (W30) | View on GitHub
Previous picks: tonone, mnemos, databricks-pack, kobiton-automate, skyvern, code-cleanup, web-analytics, token-optimizer, executive-assistant-skills, skill-creator, cursor-pack, crypto-portfolio-tracker. See all at tonsofskills.com.
Every number below names the cohort it counts and the command that reproduces it — an unlabeled count is how a corpus ends up with five contradictory answers to "how many skills."
| Count | Cohort | Reproduce with |
|---|---|---|
| 442 | catalog plugins (catalog-entry cohort) | node scripts/generate-readme-toc.mjs over marketplace.extended.json |
| 3,067 | marketplace-visible skills (distinct) | node -e "import('./scripts/corpus-resolver.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.resolveCorpus('marketplace-visible').length))" |
| 347 | agent definitions in plugins | git ls-files 'plugins/**' | grep '/agents/.*\.md' |
| 19 | plugin categories | ls -d plugins/*/ |
Across 396 published packages in the claude-code-plugins namespace. Updated daily by GitHub Actions.
| Window | All packages | Established (>30d) |
|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours | 962 | 962 |
| Last 7 days | 2,920 | 2,916 |
| Last 30 days | 12,868 | 12,779 |
"Established" excludes packages first published within the last 30 days, so a bulk-publish event doesn't dominate the headline.
Top 10 by last 30 days:
Last refreshed 2026-08-19T03:03:05.709Z.
Five real questions, five doors — each resolves to a live, generated surface, never a hand-maintained list:
The 19 categories below link into the live marketplace. Plugin counts are the catalog-entry cohort — regenerated from marketplace.extended.json by this generator; the catalog itself lives on tonsofskills.com, never in this file (§ 6A of the platform blueprint).
| Category | Plugins | |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 | AI & Machine Learning | 36 |
| 🎭 | AI Agents & Agency | 10 |
| 🔌 | API Development | 26 |
| 💼 | Business Tools | 6 |
| 👥 | Community | 21 |
| ₿ | Crypto & Web3 | 27 |
| 💾 | Database | 26 |
| 🎨 | Design | 2 |
| 🔧 | DevOps & Infrastructure | 36 |
| 📚 | Examples & Templates | 5 |
| 🧩 | MCP Servers | 16 |
| 📦 | Packages | 5 |
| ⚡ | Performance | 25 |
| ✅ | Productivity | 30 |
| 🎁 | SaaS Skill Packs | 106 |
| 🔐 | Security | 27 |
| ✨ | Skill Enhancers | 9 |
| 🧪 | Testing | 28 |
| 📁 | Analytics | 1 |
Four artifact classes live in this repository, distinguished on sight and never blurred — provenance is a truth requirement here, not a UX nicety:
| Class | What it is | How the reader can tell |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical skill | First-party, harness-free, the source of truth | No .source.json in its plugin directory |
| Generated adapter | A thin, machine-produced harness projection | Lives under a generated path with a "generated — do not edit" header |
| First-party package | An Intent Solutions distribution (npm, cowork zip) | @intentsolutionsio scope, IS-authored license |
| Upstream mirror | Somebody else's work, hosted mirror-by-default | .source.json present — upstream author, license, and pinned commit recorded |
Not yet certified. The certification program (tiers T0–T4 with retained, hash-matched evidence) is a later epic of the platform blueprint; until its report exists, no artifact on this surface claims a tier. This line is rendered from the absence of certification-report.json — honestly, not cosmetically.
Start with the contribution guide, then the intake and review standards every submission passes through:
External plugins are hosted mirror-by-default: the contributor's repository stays the source of truth, every mirrored source is pinned in a content lockfile, and upstream credit — author, license, resolved commit — is recorded in the mirror itself. Improvements flow by upstreaming to the author's repository, never by silently editing the mirror. The full decision record is the external-sync model.
MIT for the repository scaffolding and first-party tooling; each plugin carries its own license in its manifest, and mirrored plugins keep their upstream license verbatim.
name: apify-performance-tuning
description: 'Optimize Apify Actor performance: crawl speed, memory usage, concurrency,
and proxy rotation.
Use when Actors are slow, consuming too much memory, or being blocked by target
sites, or when a crawl is too expensive per run.
Trigger with "apify performance", "optimize apify actor", "apify slow", "crawlee
concurrency", "apify memory tuning", "scraper performance".
'
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit
version: 1.5.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
tags:
- saas
- scraping
- automation
- apify
compatibility: Designed for Claude CodeOptimize Apify Actors for speed, cost, and reliability. Covers Crawlee concurrency settings, memory profiling, proxy rotation strategies, request batching, and crawler selection for different workloads.
The workflow is a repeatable loop: measure a baseline, apply one lever, re-measure. The single highest-impact lever is usually crawler choice — swapping a browser crawler for CheerioCrawler on non-JS pages is a 5-10x speedup on its own. The full six-step walkthrough, with every code block, lives in references/implementation.md.
apify-sdk-patternsAPIFY_TOKEN in the environment for reading run stats via ApifyClientWork the levers in order. Each step is expanded — with copy-paste code — in the reference file linked below.
runTimeSecs, requestsFinished, memAvgBytes, and usageTotalUsd from the run stats before changing anything. You cannot judge an optimization without a before number.HttpCrawler/CheerioCrawler for static HTML or JSON (low memory, fast); PlaywrightCrawler/PuppeteerCrawler only when the page genuinely needs JavaScript rendering.maxConcurrency for Cheerio (up to ~50); keep it low (~3-5) for browser crawlers because each page costs ~200MB. Let autoscaledPoolOptions adjust within the band.preNavigationHooks and cap concurrent browsers.memory x duration — start low (512 MB for Cheerio) and only raise it if the Actor is memory-starved.Full step-by-step walkthrough with all code: references/implementation.md.
The minimal starting skeleton — swap a browser crawler for Cheerio and push immediately:
import { CheerioCrawler } from 'crawlee';
import { Actor } from 'apify';
const crawler = new CheerioCrawler({
maxConcurrency: 50, // Cheerio is cheap — parallelize hard
maxRequestsPerMinute: 300, // But cap the rate to protect the target
requestHandler: async ({ $, request }) => {
await Actor.pushData({ url: request.url, title: $('title').text().trim() });
},
});
Applying this skill produces:
Instrument the running crawl to confirm the gains in real time — see references/monitoring.md for the throughput logger and a before/after impact table.
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Out of memory crash | Too many concurrent browsers | Reduce maxConcurrency |
| Slow crawl speed | Low concurrency | Increase maxConcurrency |
| High failure rate | Anti-bot blocking | Add proxy, reduce concurrency |
| Expensive runs | Over-provisioned memory | Profile and reduce allocation |
| Stalled crawl | Request handler timeout | Set requestHandlerTimeoutSecs |
Slow Playwright crawl on static pages. The Actor renders every page in a browser at 3 pages/min. The pages are server-rendered HTML, so switch to CheerioCrawler and raise maxConcurrency — ~30 pages/min (10x). Code: references/implementation.md Steps 1-2.
Out-of-memory crashes under load. A PlaywrightCrawler at maxConcurrency: 20 OOMs. Drop concurrency to 3, block images/CSS/fonts in preNavigationHooks, and call window.stop() post-navigation. Code: references/implementation.md Step 3.
Getting blocked (403s) mid-crawl. Start on datacenter proxies, and on a 403 re-enqueue the request with a residential proxy and retire the session to force a new IP. Code: references/implementation.md Step 5.
Runs cost too much. A 4GB allocation bills 8x more than needed for HTML parsing. Right-size to 512 MB and re-measure cost/run. Code: references/implementation.md Step 4; impact table in references/monitoring.md.
For cost optimization beyond performance tuning, see the apify-cost-tuning skill in this pack — it covers compute-unit budgeting, storage costs, and scheduling strategies that this skill's memory right-sizing feeds into.
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!