复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform. The canonical layer is harness-free by construction; Claude Code is currently the verified-native harness. Other harnesses remain engineering candidates until their native-path integration is verified; source research alone is never presented as public support.
Version semantics: the release badge is this marketplace's display version. npm packages, including the
ccpiCLI and publishable plugins, retain their own package versions; they are intentionally not expected to equal the display version. The version-surface checker governs the display surfaces without rewriting package semver.
Inside Claude Code, one command installs the whole marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins
Or use the CLI:
pnpm add -g @intentsolutionsio/ccpi
ccpi install devops-automation-pack
Browse the marketplace · Explore plugins · Download bundles
Killer Skill of the Week — no-ai-slop by Peter Yang
Strip AI slop from any draft — named-pattern edits that keep the writer's real voice
no-ai-slop does two jobs and refuses to fake a third. In Edit mode it makes the minimum effective edit — cutting throat-clearing, weak verbs, and abstract nouns while deliberately preserving the writer's cadence, bluntness, humor, and honest admissions, so a rough draft still sounds like the same person afterward. In Detect mode it names each AI-slop pattern it finds, quotes the offending line, and gives the fix in a few words — and pointedly does NOT score the draft or guess whether an AI wrote it. That restraint is the whole point: AI detectors guess; named patterns are evidence the reader can check. MIT-licensed, single focused skill, actively maintained by Peter Yang.
"AI detectors guess. Named patterns are evidence the user can check." — Peter Yang
Grade: A | Week of July 22, 2026 (W30) | View on GitHub
Previous picks: tonone, mnemos, databricks-pack, kobiton-automate, skyvern, code-cleanup, web-analytics, token-optimizer, executive-assistant-skills, skill-creator, cursor-pack, crypto-portfolio-tracker. See all at tonsofskills.com.
Every number below names the cohort it counts and the command that reproduces it — an unlabeled count is how a corpus ends up with five contradictory answers to "how many skills."
| Count | Cohort | Reproduce with |
|---|---|---|
| 442 | catalog plugins (catalog-entry cohort) | node scripts/generate-readme-toc.mjs over marketplace.extended.json |
| 3,067 | marketplace-visible skills (distinct) | node -e "import('./scripts/corpus-resolver.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.resolveCorpus('marketplace-visible').length))" |
| 347 | agent definitions in plugins | git ls-files 'plugins/**' | grep '/agents/.*\.md' |
| 19 | plugin categories | ls -d plugins/*/ |
Across 396 published packages in the claude-code-plugins namespace. Updated daily by GitHub Actions.
| Window | All packages | Established (>30d) |
|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours | 962 | 962 |
| Last 7 days | 2,920 | 2,916 |
| Last 30 days | 12,868 | 12,779 |
"Established" excludes packages first published within the last 30 days, so a bulk-publish event doesn't dominate the headline.
Top 10 by last 30 days:
Last refreshed 2026-08-19T03:03:05.709Z.
Five real questions, five doors — each resolves to a live, generated surface, never a hand-maintained list:
The 19 categories below link into the live marketplace. Plugin counts are the catalog-entry cohort — regenerated from marketplace.extended.json by this generator; the catalog itself lives on tonsofskills.com, never in this file (§ 6A of the platform blueprint).
| Category | Plugins | |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 | AI & Machine Learning | 36 |
| 🎭 | AI Agents & Agency | 10 |
| 🔌 | API Development | 26 |
| 💼 | Business Tools | 6 |
| 👥 | Community | 21 |
| ₿ | Crypto & Web3 | 27 |
| 💾 | Database | 26 |
| 🎨 | Design | 2 |
| 🔧 | DevOps & Infrastructure | 36 |
| 📚 | Examples & Templates | 5 |
| 🧩 | MCP Servers | 16 |
| 📦 | Packages | 5 |
| ⚡ | Performance | 25 |
| ✅ | Productivity | 30 |
| 🎁 | SaaS Skill Packs | 106 |
| 🔐 | Security | 27 |
| ✨ | Skill Enhancers | 9 |
| 🧪 | Testing | 28 |
| 📁 | Analytics | 1 |
Four artifact classes live in this repository, distinguished on sight and never blurred — provenance is a truth requirement here, not a UX nicety:
| Class | What it is | How the reader can tell |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical skill | First-party, harness-free, the source of truth | No .source.json in its plugin directory |
| Generated adapter | A thin, machine-produced harness projection | Lives under a generated path with a "generated — do not edit" header |
| First-party package | An Intent Solutions distribution (npm, cowork zip) | @intentsolutionsio scope, IS-authored license |
| Upstream mirror | Somebody else's work, hosted mirror-by-default | .source.json present — upstream author, license, and pinned commit recorded |
Not yet certified. The certification program (tiers T0–T4 with retained, hash-matched evidence) is a later epic of the platform blueprint; until its report exists, no artifact on this surface claims a tier. This line is rendered from the absence of certification-report.json — honestly, not cosmetically.
Start with the contribution guide, then the intake and review standards every submission passes through:
External plugins are hosted mirror-by-default: the contributor's repository stays the source of truth, every mirrored source is pinned in a content lockfile, and upstream credit — author, license, resolved commit — is recorded in the mirror itself. Improvements flow by upstreaming to the author's repository, never by silently editing the mirror. The full decision record is the external-sync model.
MIT for the repository scaffolding and first-party tooling; each plugin carries its own license in its manifest, and mirrored plugins keep their upstream license verbatim.
name: clade-performance-tuning
description: "Optimize Anthropic API latency \u2014 streaming, prompt caching, model\
\ selection,\nUse when working with performance-tuning patterns.\nconnection reuse,\
\ and parallel requests.\nTrigger with \"anthropic slow\", \"claude latency\", \"\
speed up anthropic\",\n\"anthropic performance\", \"claude response time\".\n"
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit
version: 1.0.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
tags:
- saas
- anthropic
- claude
- performance
- latency
compatibility: Designed for Claude CodeClaude latency has two components: time to first token (TTFT) and tokens per second (TPS). Different strategies target each.
| Model | TTFT (p50) | TTFT (p95) | Output TPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 200ms | 600ms | ~150 |
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 400ms | 1.2s | ~90 |
| Claude Opus 4 | 800ms | 2.5s | ~40 |
// Streaming delivers the first token ASAP — user sees response instantly
// instead of waiting for the full response to generate
const stream = client.messages.stream({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-20250514',
max_tokens: 1024,
messages,
});
// First token arrives in ~400ms (Sonnet)
// Full response may take 5-10s, but user sees progress immediately
for await (const event of stream) {
if (event.type === 'content_block_delta') {
yield event.delta.text;
}
}
// Cached prompts skip re-processing — dramatically lower TTFT for large system prompts
const message = await client.messages.create({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-20250514',
max_tokens: 1024,
system: [{
type: 'text',
text: largeSystemPrompt, // 10K+ tokens
cache_control: { type: 'ephemeral' },
}],
messages,
}, {
headers: { 'claude-beta': 'prompt-caching-2024-07-31' },
});
// TTFT drops from ~2s to ~500ms on cache hit with large prompts
// Haiku is 2-4x faster than Sonnet with 80% quality for many tasks
// Use for: classification, extraction, simple Q&A, routing decisions
const route = await client.messages.create({
model: 'claude-haiku-4-5-20251001', // 200ms TTFT
max_tokens: 10,
system: 'Classify the intent. Reply with exactly one word: search, create, update, delete.',
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: userInput }],
});
// Then use Sonnet/Opus for the actual task
// BAD — creates new connection pool per request
app.get('/api/chat', async (req, res) => {
const client = new Anthropic(); // DON'T
// ...
});
// GOOD — single client shared across requests
const client = new Anthropic(); // Module-level singleton
app.get('/api/chat', async (req, res) => {
const message = await client.messages.create({ ... });
// ...
});
// When you need multiple independent Claude calls, fire them in parallel
const [summary, sentiment, entities] = await Promise.all([
client.messages.create({ model: 'claude-haiku-4-5-20251001', max_tokens: 200,
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: `Summarize: ${text}` }] }),
client.messages.create({ model: 'claude-haiku-4-5-20251001', max_tokens: 20,
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: `Sentiment (positive/negative/neutral): ${text}` }] }),
client.messages.create({ model: 'claude-haiku-4-5-20251001', max_tokens: 200,
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: `Extract named entities from: ${text}` }] }),
]);
// Fewer output tokens = faster response
system: 'Be extremely concise. Use bullet points, not paragraphs.',
// Set tight max_tokens
max_tokens: 256, // Don't use 4096 for short answers
| Issue | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| TTFT > 3s | Large uncached prompt | Enable prompt caching |
| Slow output | Using Opus for simple tasks | Downgrade to Haiku/Sonnet |
| Timeouts | Long generation + default timeout | new Anthropic({ timeout: 120_000 }) |
| 529 overloaded | API capacity | SDK auto-retries; add fallback model |
See Latency Benchmarks table and six numbered strategy sections above, each with complete TypeScript code examples.
See clade-deploy-integration for production deployment patterns.
clade-install-auth
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!