复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform. The canonical layer is harness-free by construction; Claude Code is currently the verified-native harness. Other harnesses remain engineering candidates until their native-path integration is verified; source research alone is never presented as public support.
Version semantics: the release badge is this marketplace's display version. npm packages, including the
ccpiCLI and publishable plugins, retain their own package versions; they are intentionally not expected to equal the display version. The version-surface checker governs the display surfaces without rewriting package semver.
Inside Claude Code, one command installs the whole marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins
Or use the CLI:
pnpm add -g @intentsolutionsio/ccpi
ccpi install devops-automation-pack
Browse the marketplace · Explore plugins · Download bundles
Killer Skill of the Week — no-ai-slop by Peter Yang
Strip AI slop from any draft — named-pattern edits that keep the writer's real voice
no-ai-slop does two jobs and refuses to fake a third. In Edit mode it makes the minimum effective edit — cutting throat-clearing, weak verbs, and abstract nouns while deliberately preserving the writer's cadence, bluntness, humor, and honest admissions, so a rough draft still sounds like the same person afterward. In Detect mode it names each AI-slop pattern it finds, quotes the offending line, and gives the fix in a few words — and pointedly does NOT score the draft or guess whether an AI wrote it. That restraint is the whole point: AI detectors guess; named patterns are evidence the reader can check. MIT-licensed, single focused skill, actively maintained by Peter Yang.
"AI detectors guess. Named patterns are evidence the user can check." — Peter Yang
Grade: A | Week of July 22, 2026 (W30) | View on GitHub
Previous picks: tonone, mnemos, databricks-pack, kobiton-automate, code-cleanup, web-analytics, token-optimizer, executive-assistant-skills, skill-creator, cursor-pack, crypto-portfolio-tracker. See all at tonsofskills.com.
Every number below names the cohort it counts and the command that reproduces it — an unlabeled count is how a corpus ends up with five contradictory answers to "how many skills."
| Count | Cohort | Reproduce with |
|---|---|---|
| 440 | catalog plugins (catalog-entry cohort) | node scripts/generate-readme-toc.mjs over marketplace.extended.json |
| 2,984 | marketplace-visible skills (distinct) | node -e "import('./scripts/corpus-resolver.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.resolveCorpus('marketplace-visible').length))" |
| 347 | agent definitions in plugins | git ls-files 'plugins/**' | grep '/agents/.*\.md' |
| 19 | plugin categories | ls -d plugins/*/ |
Across 394 published packages in the claude-code-plugins namespace. Updated daily by GitHub Actions.
| Window | All packages | Established (>30d) |
|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours | 641 | 641 |
| Last 7 days | 3,272 | 3,272 |
| Last 30 days | 11,794 | 11,794 |
"Established" excludes packages first published within the last 30 days, so a bulk-publish event doesn't dominate the headline.
Top 10 by last 30 days:
Last refreshed 2026-09-02T04:55:57.759Z.
Five real questions, five doors — each resolves to a live, generated surface, never a hand-maintained list:
The 19 categories below link into the live marketplace. Plugin counts are the catalog-entry cohort — regenerated from marketplace.extended.json by this generator; the catalog itself lives on tonsofskills.com, never in this file (§ 6A of the platform blueprint).
| Category | Plugins | |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 | AI & Machine Learning | 37 |
| 🎭 | AI Agents & Agency | 9 |
| 🔌 | API Development | 26 |
| 💼 | Business Tools | 6 |
| 👥 | Community | 20 |
| ₿ | Crypto & Web3 | 27 |
| 💾 | Database | 26 |
| 🎨 | Design | 2 |
| 🔧 | DevOps & Infrastructure | 36 |
| 📚 | Examples & Templates | 5 |
| 🧩 | MCP Servers | 17 |
| 📦 | Packages | 5 |
| ⚡ | Performance | 25 |
| ✅ | Productivity | 29 |
| 🎁 | SaaS Skill Packs | 105 |
| 🔐 | Security | 27 |
| ✨ | Skill Enhancers | 9 |
| 🧪 | Testing | 28 |
| 📁 | Analytics | 1 |
Four artifact classes live in this repository, distinguished on sight and never blurred — provenance is a truth requirement here, not a UX nicety:
| Class | What it is | How the reader can tell |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical skill | First-party, harness-free, the source of truth | No .source.json in its plugin directory |
| Generated adapter | A thin, machine-produced harness projection | Lives under a generated path with a "generated — do not edit" header |
| First-party package | An Intent Solutions distribution (npm, cowork zip) | @intentsolutionsio scope, IS-authored license |
| Upstream mirror | Somebody else's work, hosted mirror-by-default | .source.json present — upstream author, license, and pinned commit recorded |
Not yet certified. The certification program (tiers T0–T4 with retained, hash-matched evidence) is a later epic of the platform blueprint; until its report exists, no artifact on this surface claims a tier. This line is rendered from the absence of certification-report.json — honestly, not cosmetically.
Start with the contribution guide, then the intake and review standards every submission passes through:
External plugins are hosted mirror-by-default: the contributor's repository stays the source of truth, every mirrored source is pinned in a content lockfile, and upstream credit — author, license, resolved commit — is recorded in the mirror itself. Improvements flow by upstreaming to the author's repository, never by silently editing the mirror. The full decision record is the external-sync model.
MIT for the repository scaffolding and first-party tooling; each plugin carries its own license in its manifest, and mirrored plugins keep their upstream license verbatim.
name: clay-upgrade-migration
description: 'Navigate Clay plan changes, pricing migrations, and feature upgrades.
Use when upgrading Clay plans, migrating to the 2026 pricing model,
or adapting integrations to new Clay features.
Trigger with phrases like "upgrade clay", "clay migration", "clay pricing change",
"clay plan upgrade", "clay new pricing".
'
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(curl:*), Grep
version: 1.14.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
tags:
- saas
- clay
- api
- migration
compatibility: Designed for Claude CodeGuide for navigating Clay plan upgrades and the March 2026 pricing overhaul. Clay restructured from Starter/Explorer/Pro to Launch/Growth tiers, split credits into Data Credits + Actions, and cut data costs 50-90%. This skill covers migration decisions, integration impact, and adaptation strategies.
Old Plans (Legacy -- available until April 10, 2026):
| Plan | Price | Credits | Key Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $149/mo | Limited | No HTTP API, no webhooks |
| Explorer | $349/mo | 25K | 400 records/hour throttle |
| Pro | $800/mo | 50K | HTTP API, webhooks, priority support |
New Plans (March 2026+):
| Plan | Price | Data Credits | Actions | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launch | $185/mo | 2,500 | 15,000 | Phone enrichment, signal tracking |
| Growth | $495/mo | 6,000 | 40,000 | CRM sync, HTTP API, web intent, ads |
Key changes:
# Check current plan and credit usage from Clay dashboard
# Navigate to Settings > Plans & Billing
# Record:
# - Current plan tier
# - Monthly credits used (average over 3 months)
# - Which enrichment providers consume most credits
# - Whether you use HTTP API columns
# - Whether you use webhook sources
Decision matrix for migration:
| If you currently... | Recommended new plan |
|---|---|
| Use < 2,500 data credits/mo | Launch ($185) |
| Need HTTP API columns | Growth ($495) |
| Need CRM sync | Growth ($495) |
| Use webhooks + high volume | Growth ($495) |
| Stay on legacy Explorer | Keep legacy if 400/hr limit works |
| Have Enterprise contract | Contact Clay sales |
// src/clay/credit-tracker.ts — track new split credit model
interface CreditUsage {
dataCredits: { used: number; limit: number; rolloverMax: number };
actions: { used: number; limit: number };
}
class CreditTracker {
private usage: CreditUsage;
constructor(plan: 'launch' | 'growth') {
this.usage = plan === 'launch'
? { dataCredits: { used: 0, limit: 2500, rolloverMax: 5000 }, actions: { used: 0, limit: 15000 } }
: { dataCredits: { used: 0, limit: 6000, rolloverMax: 12000 }, actions: { used: 0, limit: 40000 } };
}
recordEnrichment(dataCreditsUsed: number) {
this.usage.dataCredits.used += dataCreditsUsed;
this.usage.actions.used += 1; // Each enrichment = 1 action
if (this.usage.dataCredits.used > this.usage.dataCredits.limit * 0.8) {
console.warn(`Data credits at ${((this.usage.dataCredits.used / this.usage.dataCredits.limit) * 100).toFixed(0)}% of monthly limit`);
}
}
canAfford(estimatedCredits: number): boolean {
return (
this.usage.dataCredits.used + estimatedCredits <= this.usage.dataCredits.limit &&
this.usage.actions.used + 1 <= this.usage.actions.limit
);
}
}
No-charge on failed lookups changes the cost equation:
// Old model: every enrichment attempt cost credits, even if no data returned
// New model: only charged when data is actually returned
// This makes wider waterfall enrichments cheaper:
// Before: 5-provider waterfall = 5 charges even if only 1 finds data
// After: 5-provider waterfall = 1 charge if only 1 finds data
// Strategy: wider waterfalls are now more cost-effective
Connect your own API keys for maximum savings:
| Provider | Clay Credits (managed) | Own Key |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo | 2 data credits | 0 credits |
| Clearbit | 2-5 data credits | 0 credits |
| Hunter | 2 data credits | 0 credits |
| ZoomInfo | 5-13 data credits | 0 credits |
If moving from a plan without webhooks to one with them (or vice versa):
# Test webhook availability on new plan
curl -X POST "$CLAY_WEBHOOK_URL" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"migration_test": true, "timestamp": "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"}'
# Verify HTTP API columns still work after plan change
# HTTP API columns are only available on Growth plan
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Features disappeared | Downgraded plan | Check feature availability per tier |
| HTTP API columns disabled | Moved to Launch (no HTTP API) | Upgrade to Growth or use webhooks only |
| Higher credit usage than expected | Actions now counted separately | Monitor both Data Credits and Actions |
| Webhook stopped working | Plan change affected access | Verify webhook feature on current plan |
Create a migration receipt with source and target plan/features, affected tables and integrations, projected and observed credit use, staging evidence, production approval, and rollback result. Pricing or feature documentation is not a deployment guarantee; retain the old working configuration until the new path is proven against the intended workspace.
Test a plan-related webhook change against a staging table with a synthetic row, confirm authentication, idempotency, and downstream delivery, then compare credit consumption to the documented baseline. If a required feature is absent or a callback fails, restore the former integration and delay the cutover rather than attempting a live workaround.
For CI integration during upgrades, see clay-ci-integration.
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!