复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
AI agents skip steps.
"Looks correct" replaces running tests. "Trivial change" replaces verification. The agent confidently ships broken code because nothing structurally prevented it from skipping the work.
Harnesses have a second problem: given only a skill list, they do not route eagerly enough, or correctly enough. Good skills sit unused. So this toolkit connects the skills, agents, and workflows we want directly into the harness, automatically. You don't have to understand what is here. Say what you want in plain English and you get all the value we have put into it: the right specialist with the right methodology, behind gates that demand exit codes, not assertions.
44 domain agents, 122 workflow skills, 78 hooks, 136 scripts. Agents carry knowledge, skills enforce methodology, hooks block incomplete work, scripts handle determinism.
Works across Claude Code (/do), Codex ($do), Factory (/do), Reasonix (/do).
$ claude
> /do debug this Go test
Routing: go-engineer + systematic-debugging
Phase 1/4: Reproduce: running test, capturing failure...
Phase 2/4: Hypothesize: 3 candidates from stack trace...
Phase 3/4: Verify: isolated root cause in connection pool timeout
Phase 4/4: Fix: patch applied, test passing, PR opened
✓ Delivered: PR #847, fix connection pool timeout in health check
The router reads intent, picks a Go agent paired with a debugging skill, and runs the full lifecycle. You typed one sentence. The system did the rest.
ROUTE PLAN EXECUTE VERIFY DELIVER RECORD
┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐
│ /do │───▶│ Task │───▶│Agent │───▶│Tests │───▶│ PR │───▶│Route │
│Router│ │ Plan │ │+Skill│ │Gates │ │Branch│ │Result│
└──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘
This is the single thing that separates it from "agent with a system prompt."
| Agent Says | What Happens |
|---|---|
| "Code looks correct, skip tests" | Exit gate requires test output. Blocked. |
| "Trivial change, no verification" | Hook blocks completion without evidence. |
| "Similar to before" | Skill demands case-specific proof. |
| "User is in a hurry" | Protocol overrides time pressure. |
| "I'm confident" | Gate demands exit code, not assertion. |
Hooks fire automatically. Gates block completion. Skills encode counter-arguments at every skip-worthy step. The agent verifies or it doesn't finish.
For what I do, the difference is enormous. If you're doing simple single-file edits, maybe less so.
The same routing serves knowledge work. The content engine researches, drafts in a calibrated voice, validates against 397 AI patterns, and repurposes finished pieces for each platform. /html turns any request into a single self-contained HTML file: report, slide deck, prototype, data viz, diagram. Non-engineers who try the toolkit consistently name the HTML artifacts as the thing they love. No code, no setup beyond the installer.
Changes to the toolkit itself ship with evidence. New skills get blind A/B tests against a no-skill baseline before merge. Routing and writing-standard decisions carry measured verdicts; PHILOSOPHY.md cites the numbers. Experiments that lost go into the negative-results registry, what-didnt-work.md; the registry now covers routing reversals, unvalidated A/B citations, and disabled lint rules alongside the original program refutations.
The automated nightly evolution loop (/evolve, writes to evolution-reports/) ran regularly through mid-May 2026. It is currently dormant; recent evidence has come from manual PRs instead.
git clone https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent.git ~/vexjoy-agent
cd ~/vexjoy-agent
./install.sh
Links into ~/.claude/ and mirrors into ~/.codex/, ~/.factory/, ~/.reasonix/ — each mirror only when that runtime is detected (its command on PATH or its home dir already exists). The installer asks symlink (live updates via git pull) or copy (stable snapshot).
Want only part of the toolkit? Run ./install.sh --configure to pick which skills, agents, and hooks install, or copy .local.example/profile.yaml to .local/profile.yaml and edit. No profile file = full install, unchanged behavior. Credit: @thomasvan. Details: .local.example/README.md.
| CLI | Entry Point |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | /do |
| Codex | $do |
| Factory | /do |
| Reasonix | /do |
Full setup: docs/start-here.md
Mirrors agents, skills, and supported hooks into ~/.codex/. The original six-hook allowlist was correct for Codex v0.114, when tool hooks only intercepted Bash. Current support requires Codex v0.144.1+ and classifies the 74 Claude hook registrations as 26 native, 35 adapter-backed, and 13 unsupported (61 supported). These are registration counts, not unique hook files. The installer also preserves explicit per-subagent model routing for GPT-5.6 Sol by setting the MultiAgent V2 compatibility keys documented in openai/codex#31814.
Codex now exposes apply_patch to tool hooks. VexJoy's adapter converts each patch operation into the Write/Edit payload expected by existing guards, but it cannot intercept writes performed through unified_exec, unmatched MCP tools, WebSearch, or other unsupported tool paths. PreCompact and Stop adapters also receive less telemetry than Claude Code: Codex does not provide Claude's conversation_history or session_data. This is expanded compatibility, not full Claude parity.
After install or any hook-definition change, run /hooks in Codex and review the new definitions before trusting them. Codex hash-trusts hook commands and skips changed, unreviewed definitions.
Gemini CLI support removed (deprecated upstream, transitioned to Antigravity CLI); Antigravity support pending CLI maturity. Per Google's transition announcement, Gemini CLI stops serving requests on 2026-06-18 for Google AI Pro / Ultra and free Gemini Code Assist for individuals. Gemini API integrations (image-gen backends, sprite pipeline, GEMINI_API_KEY) are unaffected and stay in the toolkit.
If a prior install mirrored into ~/.gemini/, remove the stale mirrors with:
rm -rf ~/.gemini/skills ~/.gemini/agents ~/.gemini/hooks ~/.gemini/scripts ~/.gemini/antigravity/plugins/vexjoy-agent
Mirrors agents (as "droids"), skills, and all hooks into ~/.factory/. Hook config merges into ~/.factory/settings.json with paths rewritten.
Mirrors skills, scripts, and the allowlisted hooks (scripts/reasonix-hooks-allowlist.txt) into ~/.reasonix/ (no agent or custom-command surface, so neither is installed; the /do router rides in as a skill). Reasonix fires only 4 events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, UserPromptSubmit, Stop), so only hooks for those events are allowlisted. Hook config is written to the hooks key of ~/.reasonix/settings.json in Reasonix's native flat shape (one entry per hook, match regex over the tool name); the generator builds absolute python3 commands, so no path rewrite is applied. MCP/model/permissions in ~/.reasonix/config.json are user-owned and left untouched.
The toolkit supplies its own routing, domain knowledge, methodology, and enforcement. The default system prompt duplicates most of that.
claude --system-prompt "."
Strips built-in tool-use instructions. The toolkit's agents, skills, hooks, and CLAUDE.md provide equivalent coverage.
| Layer | Count | Does |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | 44 | Domain knowledge: idiom tables, failure mode catalogs, error-to-fix mappings |
| Skills | 122 | Phased methodology with gates. Can't skip steps. Each phase has exit criteria requiring evidence. |
| Hooks | 78 | Fire on lifecycle events. Block incomplete work. Zero LLM cost. |
| Scripts | 136 | Determinism: test runners, linters, validators. No LLM judgment. |
Full skill catalog: docs/skills.md.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SKILL.md │
│ ┌─ Frontmatter ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ triggers, pairs_with, success-criteria │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ Reference Loading Table (conditional imports) │
│ Phased Instructions (numbered, with gates) │
│ Verification (evidence requirements) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
A game built entirely by Claude Code using these agents, skills, and pipelines:
I just want to use it Install, learn /do, done.
I do knowledge work Writing, research, data analysis, moderation, HTML artifacts. No code.
I'm a developer Architecture, extension points, adding agents and skills.
I'm an AI power user Routing tables, pipelines, hooks, telemetry DB.
I'm an AI agent Machine-dense inventory. Tables, paths, schemas.
I'm on LinkedIn 🚀 Thought leadership. Agree? 👇
Full design philosophy: PHILOSOPHY.md
One report-only script surfaces upkeep work; it prints a digest and never edits, deletes, or blocks.
python3 scripts/stale-skill-scan.py --top 20 ranks stale skills and agents as pruning candidates. Run it quarterly; see docs/deprecation-template.md.Scheduled work follows the same boundary as everything else: judgment uses agents; repeatable plumbing uses scripts.
| Need | Use |
|---|---|
| Run a deterministic command on a schedule | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with runner: "command" |
| Run an agent judgment on a schedule, webhook, or file change | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with the default runner: "claude" |
| Install or remove a user crontab entry safely | scripts/crontab-manager.py |
| Audit shell cron reliability | cron-automation |
| Keep one interactive objective moving until criteria verify | objective-loop |
See CONTRIBUTING.md.
MIT. See LICENSE.
name: code-linting
user-invocable: false
description: "Run Python (ruff) and JavaScript (Biome) linting."
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Grep
- Glob
- Bash
- Edit
- Write
routing:
triggers:
- "lint code"
- "run ruff"
- "run biome"
- "format code"
- "lint errors"
category: code-quality
pairs_with:
- code-cleanup
- universal-quality-gate
- python-quality-gateUnified linting workflow for Python (ruff) and JavaScript (Biome). Covers check, format, and auto-fix for both languages. Only handles Python and JavaScript/TypeScript -- complex logic issues and other languages are out of scope.
| Signal | Load These Files | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Python violations, ruff rules, F401/E711/B006/UP errors | ruff-rules-reference.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
| ruff not found, pyproject.toml config, ruff version differences | ruff-rules-reference.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
| JavaScript/TypeScript violations, Biome rules, noVar/useConst/noDoubleEquals | biome-rules-reference.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
| biome not found, biome.json config, migrating from ESLint | biome-rules-reference.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
| Linting CI failures, format check vs lint check differences | biome-rules-reference.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
Before running any linter, read the repository's CLAUDE.md for project-specific linting rules -- those override every default below. Then locate the project's linter config files (pyproject.toml for ruff, biome.json for Biome). All linter invocations must use these configs as-is; never override line width, rule sets, or other project settings.
When a project contains both Python and JavaScript/TypeScript, lint both unless the user explicitly requests a single language. Run the check command first to see what violations exist:
# Python -- use project venv when available
ruff check .
# or: ./venv/bin/ruff check .
# JavaScript/TypeScript
npx @biomejs/biome check src/
Always display the complete linter output. Never summarize results as "no issues found" or describe output secondhand -- show the actual command output so the user can see every error, warning, and style issue together.
Read the full output and understand what violations exist and their severity before applying any fixes. Jumping straight to --fix without reviewing risks auto-removing imports that are still needed or making changes that reduce readability.
Apply --fix for safe categories: formatting, import ordering, and style issues that the linter can correct mechanically.
# Python
ruff check --fix .
ruff format .
# JavaScript/TypeScript
npx @biomejs/biome check --write src/
npx @biomejs/biome format --write src/
Only run the linters and fixes that were requested. Do not add custom rules, configuration changes, or additional tooling unless the user explicitly asks.
After auto-fix, review the diff to verify changes are correct and safe:
git diff
Auto-fixes can occasionally remove imports that are still needed, reformat code in ways that hurt readability, or introduce subtle bugs through variable shadowing changes. Revert any problematic auto-fixes before proceeding.
For violations that cannot be auto-fixed, explain each one and how to resolve it:
Python common fixes:
ruff check --fixJavaScript common fixes:
var with let/constconst for unchanging values=== instead of ==Run the linter one final time to confirm zero violations before suggesting a commit:
ruff check .
ruff format --check .
npx @biomejs/biome check src/
Report output factually -- no self-congratulation, just the command results.
Remove any temporary lint report files or cache files created during execution.
make lint # Check both Python and JS
make lint-fix # Fix both Python and JS
| Tool | Config | Typical Line Width |
|---|---|---|
| ruff | pyproject.toml | 88-120 |
| biome | biome.json | 80-120 |
Cause: Virtual environment not activated or ruff not installed Solution:
./venv/bin/ruff or ./env/bin/ruffpip install ruffpipx run ruff check .Cause: Biome not installed in project
Solution: Run npx @biomejs/biome to use npx-based execution
Cause: Running from wrong directory Solution: cd to project root where pyproject.toml/biome.json exist
Load these files when the task involves the corresponding domain:
| Task type | Reference file |
|---|---|
| Python violations, ruff rules, F401/E711/B006/UP errors | references/ruff-rules-reference.md |
| ruff not found, pyproject.toml config, ruff version differences | references/ruff-rules-reference.md |
| JavaScript/TypeScript violations, Biome rules, noVar/useConst/noDoubleEquals | references/biome-rules-reference.md |
| biome not found, biome.json config, migrating from ESLint | references/biome-rules-reference.md |
| Linting CI failures, format check vs lint check differences | references/ruff-rules-reference.md + references/biome-rules-reference.md |
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!