复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform. The canonical layer is harness-free by construction; Claude Code is currently the verified-native harness. Other harnesses remain engineering candidates until their native-path integration is verified; source research alone is never presented as public support.
Version semantics: the release badge is this marketplace's display version. npm packages, including the
ccpiCLI and publishable plugins, retain their own package versions; they are intentionally not expected to equal the display version. The version-surface checker governs the display surfaces without rewriting package semver.
Inside Claude Code, one command installs the whole marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins
Or use the CLI:
pnpm add -g @intentsolutionsio/ccpi
ccpi install devops-automation-pack
Browse the marketplace · Explore plugins · Download bundles
Killer Skill of the Week — no-ai-slop by Peter Yang
Strip AI slop from any draft — named-pattern edits that keep the writer's real voice
no-ai-slop does two jobs and refuses to fake a third. In Edit mode it makes the minimum effective edit — cutting throat-clearing, weak verbs, and abstract nouns while deliberately preserving the writer's cadence, bluntness, humor, and honest admissions, so a rough draft still sounds like the same person afterward. In Detect mode it names each AI-slop pattern it finds, quotes the offending line, and gives the fix in a few words — and pointedly does NOT score the draft or guess whether an AI wrote it. That restraint is the whole point: AI detectors guess; named patterns are evidence the reader can check. MIT-licensed, single focused skill, actively maintained by Peter Yang.
"AI detectors guess. Named patterns are evidence the user can check." — Peter Yang
Grade: A | Week of July 22, 2026 (W30) | View on GitHub
Previous picks: tonone, mnemos, databricks-pack, kobiton-automate, skyvern, code-cleanup, web-analytics, token-optimizer, executive-assistant-skills, skill-creator, cursor-pack, crypto-portfolio-tracker. See all at tonsofskills.com.
Every number below names the cohort it counts and the command that reproduces it — an unlabeled count is how a corpus ends up with five contradictory answers to "how many skills."
| Count | Cohort | Reproduce with |
|---|---|---|
| 442 | catalog plugins (catalog-entry cohort) | node scripts/generate-readme-toc.mjs over marketplace.extended.json |
| 3,067 | marketplace-visible skills (distinct) | node -e "import('./scripts/corpus-resolver.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.resolveCorpus('marketplace-visible').length))" |
| 347 | agent definitions in plugins | git ls-files 'plugins/**' | grep '/agents/.*\.md' |
| 19 | plugin categories | ls -d plugins/*/ |
Across 396 published packages in the claude-code-plugins namespace. Updated daily by GitHub Actions.
| Window | All packages | Established (>30d) |
|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours | 962 | 962 |
| Last 7 days | 2,920 | 2,916 |
| Last 30 days | 12,868 | 12,779 |
"Established" excludes packages first published within the last 30 days, so a bulk-publish event doesn't dominate the headline.
Top 10 by last 30 days:
Last refreshed 2026-08-19T03:03:05.709Z.
Five real questions, five doors — each resolves to a live, generated surface, never a hand-maintained list:
The 19 categories below link into the live marketplace. Plugin counts are the catalog-entry cohort — regenerated from marketplace.extended.json by this generator; the catalog itself lives on tonsofskills.com, never in this file (§ 6A of the platform blueprint).
| Category | Plugins | |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 | AI & Machine Learning | 36 |
| 🎭 | AI Agents & Agency | 10 |
| 🔌 | API Development | 26 |
| 💼 | Business Tools | 6 |
| 👥 | Community | 21 |
| ₿ | Crypto & Web3 | 27 |
| 💾 | Database | 26 |
| 🎨 | Design | 2 |
| 🔧 | DevOps & Infrastructure | 36 |
| 📚 | Examples & Templates | 5 |
| 🧩 | MCP Servers | 16 |
| 📦 | Packages | 5 |
| ⚡ | Performance | 25 |
| ✅ | Productivity | 30 |
| 🎁 | SaaS Skill Packs | 106 |
| 🔐 | Security | 27 |
| ✨ | Skill Enhancers | 9 |
| 🧪 | Testing | 28 |
| 📁 | Analytics | 1 |
Four artifact classes live in this repository, distinguished on sight and never blurred — provenance is a truth requirement here, not a UX nicety:
| Class | What it is | How the reader can tell |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical skill | First-party, harness-free, the source of truth | No .source.json in its plugin directory |
| Generated adapter | A thin, machine-produced harness projection | Lives under a generated path with a "generated — do not edit" header |
| First-party package | An Intent Solutions distribution (npm, cowork zip) | @intentsolutionsio scope, IS-authored license |
| Upstream mirror | Somebody else's work, hosted mirror-by-default | .source.json present — upstream author, license, and pinned commit recorded |
Not yet certified. The certification program (tiers T0–T4 with retained, hash-matched evidence) is a later epic of the platform blueprint; until its report exists, no artifact on this surface claims a tier. This line is rendered from the absence of certification-report.json — honestly, not cosmetically.
Start with the contribution guide, then the intake and review standards every submission passes through:
External plugins are hosted mirror-by-default: the contributor's repository stays the source of truth, every mirrored source is pinned in a content lockfile, and upstream credit — author, license, resolved commit — is recorded in the mirror itself. Improvements flow by upstreaming to the author's repository, never by silently editing the mirror. The full decision record is the external-sync model.
MIT for the repository scaffolding and first-party tooling; each plugin carries its own license in its manifest, and mirrored plugins keep their upstream license verbatim.
name: coderabbit-ci-integration
description: 'Configure CodeRabbit as a CI gate with GitHub Actions, branch protection,
and review enforcement.
Use when setting up CodeRabbit as a required check, gating merges on review approval,
or integrating CodeRabbit status into your CI pipeline.
Trigger with phrases like "coderabbit CI", "coderabbit GitHub Actions",
"coderabbit required check", "coderabbit merge gate", "coderabbit CI pipeline".
'
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(gh:*), Bash(git:*)
version: 1.11.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
tags:
- saas
- coderabbit
- ci-cd
- github-actions
compatibility: Designed for Claude CodeIntegrate CodeRabbit into your CI/CD pipeline as a merge gate. CodeRabbit posts a GitHub Check on each PR, and you can require this check to pass before merging. This skill covers branch protection rules, GitHub Actions workflows that react to CodeRabbit reviews, and strategies for enforcing review quality in CI.
.coderabbit.yaml committed to repository root1. Go to GitHub repo > Settings > Branches > Branch protection rules
2. Click "Add rule" (or edit existing rule for `main`)
3. Enable "Require status checks to pass before merging"
4. Search for "coderabbitai" in the status checks list
5. Select it as a required check
6. Save changes
Result: PRs cannot be merged until CodeRabbit completes its review.
# .coderabbit.yaml - Control when CodeRabbit blocks merge
reviews:
request_changes_workflow: true # CodeRabbit marks review as "Changes Requested" for issues
# When true: PRs with issues show as "Changes Requested" (blocks merge if reviews required)
# When false: CodeRabbit only posts "Comment" reviews (never blocks merge)
profile: "assertive" # Controls comment volume
# chill: fewer comments, only critical issues
# assertive: balanced, blocks on significant issues
# nitpicky: detailed comments, blocks more frequently
auto_review:
enabled: true
drafts: false # Don't run CI-blocking reviews on drafts
base_branches:
- main
- develop
- "release/*"
ignore_title_keywords:
- "WIP"
- "DO NOT MERGE"
# .github/workflows/coderabbit-gate.yml
name: CodeRabbit Review Gate
on:
pull_request_review:
types: [submitted]
jobs:
check-review:
# Only run when CodeRabbit submits a review
if: github.event.review.user.login == 'coderabbitai[bot]'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Evaluate CodeRabbit review
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const reviews = await github.rest.pulls.listReviews({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
pull_number: context.issue.number,
});
const crReview = reviews.data
.filter(r => r.user.login === 'coderabbitai[bot]')
.pop();
if (!crReview) {
core.info('No CodeRabbit review found yet.');
return;
}
core.info(`CodeRabbit review state: ${crReview.state}`);
if (crReview.state === 'CHANGES_REQUESTED') {
core.setFailed('CodeRabbit requested changes. Address review feedback before merging.');
}
# .github/workflows/pr-size-check.yml
name: PR Size Check
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
jobs:
check-size:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Check PR size
run: |
CHANGES=$(git diff --stat origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | tail -1)
LINES=$(echo "$CHANGES" | grep -oP '\d+ insertion' | grep -oP '\d+' || echo 0)
DELETIONS=$(echo "$CHANGES" | grep -oP '\d+ deletion' | grep -oP '\d+' || echo 0)
TOTAL=$((LINES + DELETIONS))
echo "Total lines changed: $TOTAL"
if [ "$TOTAL" -gt 1000 ]; then
echo "::warning::PR has $TOTAL lines changed. CodeRabbit works best with PRs under 500 lines."
echo "Consider splitting into smaller PRs for better review quality."
fi
# .github/workflows/coderabbit-notify.yml
name: CodeRabbit Notification
on:
pull_request_review:
types: [submitted]
jobs:
notify:
if: >
github.event.review.user.login == 'coderabbitai[bot]' &&
github.event.review.state == 'changes_requested'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Post Slack notification
uses: slackapi/slack-github-action@v1.27.1
with:
payload: |
{
"text": "CodeRabbit found issues in PR #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}: ${{ github.event.pull_request.title }}",
"blocks": [
{
"type": "section",
"text": {
"type": "mrkdwn",
"text": "*CodeRabbit Review*: Changes requested on <${{ github.event.pull_request.html_url }}|PR #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}>"
}
}
]
}
env:
SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL: ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL }}
set -euo pipefail
# Programmatically set CodeRabbit as a required check
OWNER="your-org"
REPO="your-repo"
BRANCH="main"
gh api "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/branches/$BRANCH/protection" \
--method PUT \
--field 'required_status_checks={"strict":true,"contexts":["coderabbitai"]}' \
--field 'required_pull_request_reviews={"required_approving_review_count":1}' \
--field 'enforce_admins=true' \
--field 'restrictions=null'
echo "Branch protection updated: CodeRabbit review required for merge"
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| "coderabbitai" not in status checks list | App not installed or no PRs reviewed yet | Install App, create a test PR, then configure |
| Review blocks all PRs | request_changes_workflow: true with aggressive profile | Switch to chill or set to false |
| CI times out waiting for review | Large PR or CodeRabbit backlog | Reviews take 2-15 min depending on PR size |
| Draft PRs blocked | drafts: true in config | Set drafts: false to skip draft PR reviews |
| Status check stays pending | CodeRabbit outage | Check status.coderabbit.ai; admin merge if needed |
In a pilot repository, create a small pull request, confirm the expected CodeRabbit status appears, then apply the approved branch-protection rule and test the documented emergency path without merging unreviewed production code. If the check times out or blocks unexpectedly, follow the time-bounded incident procedure and restore the last verified protection configuration.
For deployment and multi-repo rollout, see coderabbit-deploy-integration.
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!