复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform. The canonical layer is harness-free by construction; Claude Code is currently the verified-native harness. Other harnesses remain engineering candidates until their native-path integration is verified; source research alone is never presented as public support.
Version semantics: the release badge is this marketplace's display version. npm packages, including the
ccpiCLI and publishable plugins, retain their own package versions; they are intentionally not expected to equal the display version. The version-surface checker governs the display surfaces without rewriting package semver.
Inside Claude Code, one command installs the whole marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins
Or use the CLI:
pnpm add -g @intentsolutionsio/ccpi
ccpi install devops-automation-pack
Browse the marketplace · Explore plugins · Download bundles
Killer Skill of the Week — no-ai-slop by Peter Yang
Strip AI slop from any draft — named-pattern edits that keep the writer's real voice
no-ai-slop does two jobs and refuses to fake a third. In Edit mode it makes the minimum effective edit — cutting throat-clearing, weak verbs, and abstract nouns while deliberately preserving the writer's cadence, bluntness, humor, and honest admissions, so a rough draft still sounds like the same person afterward. In Detect mode it names each AI-slop pattern it finds, quotes the offending line, and gives the fix in a few words — and pointedly does NOT score the draft or guess whether an AI wrote it. That restraint is the whole point: AI detectors guess; named patterns are evidence the reader can check. MIT-licensed, single focused skill, actively maintained by Peter Yang.
"AI detectors guess. Named patterns are evidence the user can check." — Peter Yang
Grade: A | Week of July 22, 2026 (W30) | View on GitHub
Previous picks: tonone, mnemos, databricks-pack, kobiton-automate, skyvern, code-cleanup, web-analytics, token-optimizer, executive-assistant-skills, skill-creator, cursor-pack, crypto-portfolio-tracker. See all at tonsofskills.com.
Every number below names the cohort it counts and the command that reproduces it — an unlabeled count is how a corpus ends up with five contradictory answers to "how many skills."
| Count | Cohort | Reproduce with |
|---|---|---|
| 442 | catalog plugins (catalog-entry cohort) | node scripts/generate-readme-toc.mjs over marketplace.extended.json |
| 3,067 | marketplace-visible skills (distinct) | node -e "import('./scripts/corpus-resolver.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.resolveCorpus('marketplace-visible').length))" |
| 347 | agent definitions in plugins | git ls-files 'plugins/**' | grep '/agents/.*\.md' |
| 19 | plugin categories | ls -d plugins/*/ |
Across 396 published packages in the claude-code-plugins namespace. Updated daily by GitHub Actions.
| Window | All packages | Established (>30d) |
|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours | 962 | 962 |
| Last 7 days | 2,920 | 2,916 |
| Last 30 days | 12,868 | 12,779 |
"Established" excludes packages first published within the last 30 days, so a bulk-publish event doesn't dominate the headline.
Top 10 by last 30 days:
Last refreshed 2026-08-19T03:03:05.709Z.
Five real questions, five doors — each resolves to a live, generated surface, never a hand-maintained list:
The 19 categories below link into the live marketplace. Plugin counts are the catalog-entry cohort — regenerated from marketplace.extended.json by this generator; the catalog itself lives on tonsofskills.com, never in this file (§ 6A of the platform blueprint).
| Category | Plugins | |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 | AI & Machine Learning | 36 |
| 🎭 | AI Agents & Agency | 10 |
| 🔌 | API Development | 26 |
| 💼 | Business Tools | 6 |
| 👥 | Community | 21 |
| ₿ | Crypto & Web3 | 27 |
| 💾 | Database | 26 |
| 🎨 | Design | 2 |
| 🔧 | DevOps & Infrastructure | 36 |
| 📚 | Examples & Templates | 5 |
| 🧩 | MCP Servers | 16 |
| 📦 | Packages | 5 |
| ⚡ | Performance | 25 |
| ✅ | Productivity | 30 |
| 🎁 | SaaS Skill Packs | 106 |
| 🔐 | Security | 27 |
| ✨ | Skill Enhancers | 9 |
| 🧪 | Testing | 28 |
| 📁 | Analytics | 1 |
Four artifact classes live in this repository, distinguished on sight and never blurred — provenance is a truth requirement here, not a UX nicety:
| Class | What it is | How the reader can tell |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical skill | First-party, harness-free, the source of truth | No .source.json in its plugin directory |
| Generated adapter | A thin, machine-produced harness projection | Lives under a generated path with a "generated — do not edit" header |
| First-party package | An Intent Solutions distribution (npm, cowork zip) | @intentsolutionsio scope, IS-authored license |
| Upstream mirror | Somebody else's work, hosted mirror-by-default | .source.json present — upstream author, license, and pinned commit recorded |
Not yet certified. The certification program (tiers T0–T4 with retained, hash-matched evidence) is a later epic of the platform blueprint; until its report exists, no artifact on this surface claims a tier. This line is rendered from the absence of certification-report.json — honestly, not cosmetically.
Start with the contribution guide, then the intake and review standards every submission passes through:
External plugins are hosted mirror-by-default: the contributor's repository stays the source of truth, every mirrored source is pinned in a content lockfile, and upstream credit — author, license, resolved commit — is recorded in the mirror itself. Improvements flow by upstreaming to the author's repository, never by silently editing the mirror. The full decision record is the external-sync model.
MIT for the repository scaffolding and first-party tooling; each plugin carries its own license in its manifest, and mirrored plugins keep their upstream license verbatim.
name: comparing-database-schemas
description: 'Process use when you need to work with schema comparison.
This skill provides database schema diff and sync with comprehensive guidance and
automation.
Trigger with phrases like "compare schemas", "diff databases",
or "sync database schemas".
'
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash(psql:*), Bash(mysql:*), Bash(mongosh:*)
version: 1.27.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license: MIT
tags:
- database
- comparing-database
compatibility: Designed for Claude CodeCompare database schemas between two environments (development vs. staging, staging vs.
psql or mysql CLI configured to connect to both environmentsinformation_schema and pg_catalog (PostgreSQL) or information_schema (MySQL)pg_dump --schema-only for full schema extractionExtract the full schema from both databases for comparison:
pg_dump --schema-only --no-owner --no-privileges -f schema_source.sql source_db and repeat for target_dbmysqldump --no-data --routines --triggers source_db > schema_source.sqlinformation_schema directly for programmatic comparisonCompare tables present in each database:
SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = 'public' AND table_catalog = 'source_db' EXCEPT SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = 'public' AND table_catalog = 'target_db'Compare columns for each shared table:
information_schema.columns from both databases for: column_name, data_type, character_maximum_length, is_nullable, column_default, ordinal_positionCompare indexes:
pg_indexes for indexname, indexdef on each databaseinformation_schema.STATISTICS for INDEX_NAME, COLUMN_NAME, NON_UNIQUECompare constraints (primary keys, foreign keys, unique, check):
information_schema.table_constraints and information_schema.key_column_usageCompare functions, stored procedures, and triggers:
pg_proc for function signatures and pg_trigger for trigger definitionsinformation_schema.ROUTINES and information_schema.TRIGGERSCompare enum types and custom types (PostgreSQL):
pg_type and pg_enum for enum label differencesGenerate a structured diff report categorizing differences as:
Generate migration SQL to synchronize the target database to match the source:
Validate the generated migration by applying it to a copy of the target database and re-running the diff. The second diff should report zero differences, confirming the migration produces the expected state.
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Connection refused to one database | Network or credential issue on source or target | Verify connection strings; check firewall rules; confirm credentials work with direct psql or mysql connection |
Permission denied on pg_catalog queries | User lacks read access to system catalogs | Grant pg_read_all_settings role; or use pg_dump --schema-only which requires fewer privileges |
| False positive differences from default value formatting | PostgreSQL normalizes default expressions differently in different versions | Normalize default value strings before comparison; ignore whitespace differences; compare semantic equivalence |
| Enum type modification blocked | PostgreSQL does not support removing enum values or reordering | Create a new enum type, migrate the column, drop the old type; document this as a multi-step migration |
| Generated migration fails on target | Target has data that violates new constraints | Add data validation queries before constraint creation; backfill default values; handle edge cases in migration |
Detecting schema drift between staging and production: After 3 months without auditing, the diff reveals: 2 columns added to production manually (not in migrations), 1 index missing from staging, and 3 functions with different implementations. A migration script is generated to bring staging in sync, and the manual production changes are backported into migration files.
Pre-deployment schema validation: Before deploying a release with 5 migration files, run the diff between the post-migration staging schema and the expected schema. The diff catches a migration that accidentally dropped a constraint that a later migration depends on. The migration ordering is fixed before production deployment.
Comparing PostgreSQL schemas across major version upgrade: Schema extracted from PostgreSQL 14 and compared against PostgreSQL 16 after migration. Diff reveals function signature changes for built-in function calls, updated default values for new parameters, and deprecated syntax in stored procedures. Migration script updates function definitions for the new version.
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!