复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
This is the open-source content repository behind
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
This is the open-source content repository behind Skill Store. It stores every approved Agent Skill, the records that go with it, and the automated security audits published with each skill.
This repo is a companion to the Skill Store platform, not the place to submit skills. Skills are added through skillstore.io — its review pipeline writes to this repo automatically. Please do not open a pull request here to add a skill; PRs adding skills will be closed. See Contributing a skill below.
The recommended way to install any skill is the skillstore CLI — one command works for both Claude Code and Codex:
npx skillstore add author/skill-name
For example:
npx skillstore add aiskillstore/code-review
It downloads the skill and drops it into the right skills/ directory for your tool. Claude Code auto-discovers it; for Codex, restart the session.
Prefer to do it by hand, or installing via Claude Web? See the full Installation Guides for every method (CLI, manual, and ZIP upload) and the scope directories (~/.agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, ~/.claude/skills/, .codex/skills/, …).
Submit through the platform — not through a pull request:
SKILL.md.SKILL.md — the skill definition (required, per the Agent Skills spec)LICENSE (recommended)Every submission is scanned automatically before it can be published. The audit flags things like:
eval, exec, raw system commands)Security analysis is report-only: findings inform maintainers and users, but a risk result does not automatically block an otherwise approved skill from being published. See our Security Trust Center for the methodology, limitations, and risk-level definitions.
Live Security Passport example:
.
├── skills/ # Approved, published skills (one folder each, with SKILL.md)
├── pending/ # Submissions awaiting review
├── packages/
│ ├── cli/ # The `skillstore` CLI (npx skillstore add …)
│ └── skillstore/
├── schemas/ # JSON schemas for skill records
├── scripts/ # Maintenance & scoring scripts
└── .github/workflows/ # Submission, audit, and sync automation
The contents of this repo are maintained by Skill Store's automated pipeline. Manual changes are limited to maintainers.
The marketplace catalog is MIT-licensed. Individual skills carry their own licenses — check each skill's LICENSE file.
name: content-quality-auditor
slug: content-quality-auditor
displayName: "Content Quality Auditor · 内容质量"
summary: "内容质量/EEAT评分"
description: 'Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-auditor; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分'
version: "17.0.0"
license: Apache-2.0
compatibility: "Claude Code and compatible agent-skill hosts"
homepage: "https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills"
when_to_use: "Use when auditing content quality before publishing. Runs a typed CORE-EEAT 80-item profile with explicit evidence gaps and veto checks. Also when the user asks for E-E-A-T analysis or publish readiness."
argument-hint: "<URL or paste content> [content type] [market]"
allowed-tools: WebFetch
class: auditor
metadata: {"author": "aaron-he-zhu", "version": "17.0.0", "discipline": "seo-geo", "phase": "optimize", "geo-relevance": "high", "hermes": {"tags": ["marketing", "seo-geo", "optimize"], "category": "seo-geo"}, "openclaw": {"emoji": "🔍", "homepage": "https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills"}}Audit one content artifact with the versioned CORE-EEAT contract. Produce evidence-linked item states, a comparable score only when coverage is complete, and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED verdict. Scores are advisory quality-control summaries, not ranking or citation predictions.
Audit this product review for the U.S. market before publication: <URL or content>
Run a CORE-EEAT comparison-profile audit and show every evidence gap: <artifact>
Use this skill for the content artifact and its source-credibility evidence. Use on-page-seo-auditor for a narrow structural audit, technical-seo-checker for crawl/index behavior, and domain-authority-auditor for domain-level CITE. A combined page/domain assessment is two linked audits, never a 120-item composite.
Reads: one artifact plus its cited/source controls. Writes: only a permissioned v3 artifact. Done when: target/profile/context are declared, every expected item has a valid state, the typed result is reported, and any approved artifact validates.
At activation, read these repository files:
../../../references/auditor-runbook.md../../../references/scoring-semantics.md../../../references/core-eeat-benchmark.md../../../references/framework-catalog.json (CORE-EEAT entry)For a standalone installation, read the bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md instead. Never fetch a mutable branch or continue with a guessed contract. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If they are absent, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact. Record schema_version: 3.0, runbook_version: 3.0.0, and catalog version in the report.
Declare before scoring:
product-review, how-to-guide, comparison, landing-page, blog-post, faq-page, alternative, best-of, or testimonial.If content type cannot be inferred safely, ask one blocking question. Do not choose the profile by whichever produces the highest score.
| Need | Preferred evidence |
|---|---|
| Artifact/body | Stable draft, rendered page, or direct URL fetch |
| Claims/citations | Primary sources, claims projection, cited records |
| Author/site controls | Byline, review policy, corrections, disclosures, security/contact evidence |
| Visual/mobile claims | Rendered captures or user-provided exports, not HTML inference |
| Historical state | Version history and dated archive evidence |
unknown for applicable but unobserved evidence. Use na only for catalog-declared conditional items and state why. Never redistribute weights around Unknown items.CORE-EEAT-C01: material title/promise mismatch.CORE-EEAT-R10: material internal factual contradiction; an isolated broken link is not this veto.CORE-EEAT-T04: a material connection exists and required disclosure is absent/materially obscured; no relationship is N/A.audit-run.schema.json and execute python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json> when the verified runtime is available. Preserve the typed input and output for reproducibility.Missing evidence prevents a total. Report the scorer's interval, coverage, and exact gaps; do not invent a score or mark the artifact failed merely because access is missing.
For medical, legal, financial, safety, or other material-risk content, verify source currency, market, reviewer identity/qualification, claim boundaries, and required disclaimers. This skill audits evidence and presentation; it does not provide professional advice or fabricate expert review.
Lead with:
## CORE-EEAT Audit
**Verdict:** SHIP | FIX | BLOCK | UNDECIDED
**Profile / target / observed:** ...
**Score:** final/raw when scored, or "Not scored — evidence coverage N%" with interval
**Confidence:** high | medium | low | not_scored
Then show dimension scores/coverage, critical evidence, findings ordered by severity and points lost, exact Unknown inputs, and a prioritized fix plan. Show qualified item IDs in a trace appendix when the user asks for reproducibility. Label the GEO and SEO four-dimension views as diagnostics, not independent totals.
Humanizer and visual/conversion rubrics are advisory supporting checks. They may inform non-veto item evidence but never create a new CORE-EEAT veto.
Use scorer output without reinterpretation:
DONE + SHIP.DONE_WITH_CONCERNS + FIX; one veto caps final at 59.DONE + BLOCK; omit final score.NEEDS_INPUT + UNDECIDED; omit raw/final scores.Route claim/disclosure fixes to offer-claims-registry, content fixes to content-writer or geo-content-optimizer, technical evidence to technical-seo-checker, and domain context to domain-authority-auditor.
DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59, cap_applied: true.DONE/BLOCK, raw retained, no final score.NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED, no raw or final score, regardless of the observed-item average.Default to plain-language findings. When traceability is requested, qualify IDs as CORE-EEAT-C01, CORE-EEAT-R10, and CORE-EEAT-T04; never show an unqualified collision-prone ID.
Do not write memory merely because an audit was requested. If the user explicitly authorizes persistence, assemble the exact v3 draft, validate it against the intended memory/audits/content/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Validate with:
python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/validate-audit-artifact.py" <draft> --relative-path <target>
Do not claim the artifact was saved if validation fails. Do not write veto markers, candidates, or hot-cache entries without the same permission.
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!