复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
A model-agnostic agent-skills platform. The canonical layer is harness-free by construction; Claude Code is currently the verified-native harness. Other harnesses remain engineering candidates until their native-path integration is verified; source research alone is never presented as public support.
Version semantics: the release badge is this marketplace's display version. npm packages, including the
ccpiCLI and publishable plugins, retain their own package versions; they are intentionally not expected to equal the display version. The version-surface checker governs the display surfaces without rewriting package semver.
Inside Claude Code, one command installs the whole marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins
Or use the CLI:
pnpm add -g @intentsolutionsio/ccpi
ccpi install devops-automation-pack
Browse the marketplace · Explore plugins · Download bundles
Killer Skill of the Week — no-ai-slop by Peter Yang
Strip AI slop from any draft — named-pattern edits that keep the writer's real voice
no-ai-slop does two jobs and refuses to fake a third. In Edit mode it makes the minimum effective edit — cutting throat-clearing, weak verbs, and abstract nouns while deliberately preserving the writer's cadence, bluntness, humor, and honest admissions, so a rough draft still sounds like the same person afterward. In Detect mode it names each AI-slop pattern it finds, quotes the offending line, and gives the fix in a few words — and pointedly does NOT score the draft or guess whether an AI wrote it. That restraint is the whole point: AI detectors guess; named patterns are evidence the reader can check. MIT-licensed, single focused skill, actively maintained by Peter Yang.
"AI detectors guess. Named patterns are evidence the user can check." — Peter Yang
Grade: A | Week of July 22, 2026 (W30) | View on GitHub
Previous picks: tonone, mnemos, databricks-pack, kobiton-automate, skyvern, code-cleanup, web-analytics, token-optimizer, executive-assistant-skills, skill-creator, cursor-pack, crypto-portfolio-tracker. See all at tonsofskills.com.
Every number below names the cohort it counts and the command that reproduces it — an unlabeled count is how a corpus ends up with five contradictory answers to "how many skills."
| Count | Cohort | Reproduce with |
|---|---|---|
| 442 | catalog plugins (catalog-entry cohort) | node scripts/generate-readme-toc.mjs over marketplace.extended.json |
| 3,067 | marketplace-visible skills (distinct) | node -e "import('./scripts/corpus-resolver.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.resolveCorpus('marketplace-visible').length))" |
| 347 | agent definitions in plugins | git ls-files 'plugins/**' | grep '/agents/.*\.md' |
| 19 | plugin categories | ls -d plugins/*/ |
Across 396 published packages in the claude-code-plugins namespace. Updated daily by GitHub Actions.
| Window | All packages | Established (>30d) |
|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours | 962 | 962 |
| Last 7 days | 2,920 | 2,916 |
| Last 30 days | 12,868 | 12,779 |
"Established" excludes packages first published within the last 30 days, so a bulk-publish event doesn't dominate the headline.
Top 10 by last 30 days:
Last refreshed 2026-08-19T03:03:05.709Z.
Five real questions, five doors — each resolves to a live, generated surface, never a hand-maintained list:
The 19 categories below link into the live marketplace. Plugin counts are the catalog-entry cohort — regenerated from marketplace.extended.json by this generator; the catalog itself lives on tonsofskills.com, never in this file (§ 6A of the platform blueprint).
| Category | Plugins | |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 | AI & Machine Learning | 36 |
| 🎭 | AI Agents & Agency | 10 |
| 🔌 | API Development | 26 |
| 💼 | Business Tools | 6 |
| 👥 | Community | 21 |
| ₿ | Crypto & Web3 | 27 |
| 💾 | Database | 26 |
| 🎨 | Design | 2 |
| 🔧 | DevOps & Infrastructure | 36 |
| 📚 | Examples & Templates | 5 |
| 🧩 | MCP Servers | 16 |
| 📦 | Packages | 5 |
| ⚡ | Performance | 25 |
| ✅ | Productivity | 30 |
| 🎁 | SaaS Skill Packs | 106 |
| 🔐 | Security | 27 |
| ✨ | Skill Enhancers | 9 |
| 🧪 | Testing | 28 |
| 📁 | Analytics | 1 |
Four artifact classes live in this repository, distinguished on sight and never blurred — provenance is a truth requirement here, not a UX nicety:
| Class | What it is | How the reader can tell |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical skill | First-party, harness-free, the source of truth | No .source.json in its plugin directory |
| Generated adapter | A thin, machine-produced harness projection | Lives under a generated path with a "generated — do not edit" header |
| First-party package | An Intent Solutions distribution (npm, cowork zip) | @intentsolutionsio scope, IS-authored license |
| Upstream mirror | Somebody else's work, hosted mirror-by-default | .source.json present — upstream author, license, and pinned commit recorded |
Not yet certified. The certification program (tiers T0–T4 with retained, hash-matched evidence) is a later epic of the platform blueprint; until its report exists, no artifact on this surface claims a tier. This line is rendered from the absence of certification-report.json — honestly, not cosmetically.
Start with the contribution guide, then the intake and review standards every submission passes through:
External plugins are hosted mirror-by-default: the contributor's repository stays the source of truth, every mirrored source is pinned in a content lockfile, and upstream credit — author, license, resolved commit — is recorded in the mirror itself. Improvements flow by upstreaming to the author's repository, never by silently editing the mirror. The full decision record is the external-sync model.
MIT for the repository scaffolding and first-party tooling; each plugin carries its own license in its manifest, and mirrored plugins keep their upstream license verbatim.
name: databricks-cost-leak-hunter
description: |
Hunt down Databricks cost leaks — wasted DBUs, idle clusters, oversized SQL
warehouses, and untagged runaway spend — and produce a FinOps cost report.
Use when a user asks why their Databricks bill is high, wants to find cost
leaks / wasted DBUs / idle clusters, or needs a FinOps cost report.
Trigger with "databricks cost", "why is my databricks bill",
"find wasted spend", "cost leak".
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(databricks:*), Bash(jq:*), Glob, mcp__databricks-workspace-mcp__clusters_get, mcp__databricks-workspace-mcp__clusters_events, mcp__databricks-workspace-mcp__clusters_list, mcp__databricks-workspace-mcp__instance_pools_list, mcp__databricks-workspace-mcp__pipelines_get
version: 2.27.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license: MIT
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
tags: [saas, databricks, finops, cost]Audits a Databricks workspace for real-dollar cost leaks — idle compute, jobs on the wrong SKU, overprovisioned clusters, and the Photon premium paid without the speedup — then emits a CFO-grokkable, dollar-ranked FinOps remediation report.
This skill finds where Databricks money is leaking and how much, in dollars, per
month. Confirmed-spend figures come from the customer's own system.billing.usage
joined to system.billing.list_prices — never an estimate. Two of the four
categories (overprovisioning, Photon premium) are explicitly modeled/at-risk
amounts, labeled as such so a CFO never confuses them with recoverable spend. The
skill surfaces four named leak categories, ranks them by monthly dollar impact, and
explains each root cause in FinOps language a CFO can act on without an engineer to
translate.
It is architecturally distinct from the v1 databricks-cost-tuning skill: that one
AUTHORS policy (creates cluster policies, spot configs). This one DETECTS leaks and
reports them, dollarized and ranked. The math is deterministic — bundled scripts in
scripts/ do the arithmetic so the agent never eyeballs numbers — and deep domain
knowledge lives in references/ loaded only when a leak needs it.
The skill uses two data planes. Dollar figures come from the Databricks CLI
Statement Execution API (databricks api post /api/2.0/sql/statements) reading
system.* — authenticated by the CLI's own DATABRICKS_HOST+DATABRICKS_TOKEN /
databricks auth login. The live config/event evidence that explains why a leak
exists (auto-termination setting, node type, autoscale floor, pool min_idle) comes
from the custom databricks-workspace-mcp control-plane tools — the one MCP
dependency. The SQL produces the number; the workspace MCP turns it into a verified,
single-config-change fix.
Read access to the billing system tables is the hard dependency and the most common
failure. system.billing.usage requires a metastore-admin grant chain — the
skill detects a missing grant upfront and reports it, rather than failing mid-flow.
GRANT USE CATALOG ON CATALOG system TO <principal>GRANT USE SCHEMA ON SCHEMA system.billing TO <principal>GRANT SELECT ON TABLE system.billing.usage TO <principal>GRANT SELECT ON TABLE system.billing.list_prices TO <principal>system.compute): system.compute.clusters, system.compute.node_timeline.databricks auth login, or DATABRICKS_HOST + DATABRICKS_TOKEN)
and jq for parsing JSON tool output. The dollar queries
run through the CLI Statement Execution API — UC enforces the grant chain above.DATABRICKS_WAREHOUSE_ID env var set to a running SQL warehouse — every
statement-execution call (Step 1's probe included) requires it.databricks-workspace-mcp registered (its own PAT/U2M/M2M auth; PAT
unsupported in Databricks-App deployment mode). It reads the live REST API, not
system.*, so it needs no system-table grants. If it is absent the skill still
produces dollar figures but cannot corroborate live config — it then accepts
pasted config input.Authentication. The CLI Statement Execution API uses DATABRICKS_HOST +
DATABRICKS_TOKEN or databricks auth login; UC enforces the metastore grant chain
on every system.* read. The custom databricks-workspace-mcp authenticates
separately via its own PAT / U2M / M2M token. No secrets are hardcoded — all auth
comes from the environment or the registered MCP server.
Run the upfront grant check before any analysis — see Step 1.
The pipeline is detect → compute → rank → report. SQL detection runs through the
CLI Statement Execution API; config corroboration runs on databricks-workspace-mcp;
the dollar arithmetic runs in scripts/; deep knowledge loads from references/ on
demand.
Probe the billing tables before anything else. If the probe errors with a
permission message, STOP and report the exact missing grant — do not continue into
the leak scans. Requires DATABRICKS_WAREHOUSE_ID (a running SQL warehouse).
databricks api post /api/2.0/sql/statements --json '{
"warehouse_id": "'"$DATABRICKS_WAREHOUSE_ID"'",
"statement": "SELECT 1 FROM system.billing.usage LIMIT 1",
"wait_timeout": "30s"
}' | jq -r '.status.state, .status.error.message // "ok"'
If state is not SUCCEEDED, load
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/system-tables-setup.md
and report the missing grant chain to the user verbatim. Stop here.
Establish the trailing-30-day total spend so every leak can be expressed as a share
of a real number, and capture the window's MAX(usage_date) to stamp into the
report. The price-window join (usage × list_prices.pricing.default, matched on
sku_name AND usage_unit within the price-effective window, currency_code='USD')
is the dollar primitive reused by every category query.
# The CLI does NOT expand ${VARS} inside a --json @file, so inject the warehouse
# id with jq at call time (the static template carries only wait_timeout + statement).
databricks api post /api/2.0/sql/statements --json "$(
jq --arg wh "$DATABRICKS_WAREHOUSE_ID" '. + {warehouse_id: $wh}' \
"${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/sql/spend-baseline.sql.json"
)"
The canonical CTE and full per-category SQL live in
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/cost-leak-categories.md.
Load it now — the four detection queries below all reference its priced CTE.
Join priced All-Purpose usage to system.compute.clusters; flag clusters whose
latest-change auto_termination_minutes = 0. Rank by 30-day idle spend. This is
confirmed spend — money actually billed for idle compute.
SELECT p.usage_metadata.cluster_id AS cluster_id,
COALESCE(c.cluster_name, 'unknown') AS cluster_name,
c.auto_termination_minutes,
ROUND(SUM(p.usd), 2) AS spend_30d_usd
FROM priced p
JOIN cluster_cfg c ON p.usage_metadata.cluster_id = c.cluster_id
WHERE p.billing_origin_product = 'ALL_PURPOSE'
AND c.auto_termination_minutes = 0
GROUP BY p.usage_metadata.cluster_id, c.cluster_name, c.auto_termination_minutes
HAVING SUM(p.usd) > 0
ORDER BY spend_30d_usd DESC;
Corroborate each flagged cluster's live config with databricks-workspace-mcp
clusters_get (confirm autotermination_minutes = 0 right now) and clusters_events
(measure the idle gap between RUNNING and TERMINATING).
The signature leak: a usage row with a job_id in usage_metadata AND
billing_origin_product = 'ALL_PURPOSE' ($0.55/DBU) instead of $0.15/DBU). Re-price the same DBUs at the current Jobs rate to compute savings.
This is confirmed savings — a deterministic re-pricing delta. The JOBS_COMPUTE
(jobs_rate
CTE is deduped to one USD rate per usage_unit so the join cannot fan out (see
cost-leak-categories.md).
SELECT p.usage_metadata.job_id AS job_id,
ROUND(SUM(p.usd), 2) AS spend_on_all_purpose_30d_usd,
ROUND(SUM(p.usd) - SUM(p.usage_quantity * jr.jobs_unit_price), 2)
AS potential_savings_30d_usd
FROM priced p
JOIN jobs_rate jr ON p.usage_unit = jr.usage_unit
WHERE p.billing_origin_product = 'ALL_PURPOSE'
AND p.usage_metadata.job_id IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY p.usage_metadata.job_id
HAVING SUM(p.usd) - SUM(p.usage_quantity * jr.jobs_unit_price) > 0
ORDER BY potential_savings_30d_usd DESC;
Confirm the live compute type is All-Purpose (not Jobs) with clusters_list /
clusters_get (cluster_source) before recommending the move. The job_id +
ALL_PURPOSE billing signal is itself dollar-accurate; the REST check is
belt-and-suspenders.
Aggregate mean CPU from system.compute.node_timeline, join to 30-day spend, flag
clusters burning real dollars at chronically low utilization (< 25%). This figure is
an estimate (est_overprovision = spend × (1 − CPU%)), not billed waste — it is
the one modeled number in the pipeline and is labeled est_* everywhere.
SELECT s.cluster_id,
ROUND(u.avg_cpu_pct, 1) AS avg_cpu_pct,
ROUND(s.spend_30d_usd, 2) AS spend_30d_usd,
ROUND(s.spend_30d_usd * (1 - LEAST(u.avg_cpu_pct,100)/100.0), 2)
AS est_overprovision_30d_usd
FROM spend s
JOIN util u ON s.cluster_id = u.cluster_id
WHERE u.avg_cpu_pct < 25 AND s.spend_30d_usd > 0
ORDER BY est_overprovision_30d_usd DESC;
Corroborate the configured floor with clusters_get (REST nested
autoscale.min_workers / autoscale.max_workers); for the idle-pool variant use
instance_pools_list (min_idle_instances + stats.idle_count) — pool waste is NOT
a billing row.
Photon is not a column on system.compute.clusters; it is billing-visible via
the SKU. Isolate usage whose sku_name ILIKE '%PHOTON%' and surface the ~2× premium
portion as the at-risk amount — money for review against actual runtime gain, not
confirmed waste.
SELECT p.usage_metadata.cluster_id AS cluster_id,
ROUND(SUM(p.usd), 2) AS photon_spend_30d_usd,
ROUND(SUM(p.usd) / 2.0, 2) AS photon_premium_at_risk_30d_usd
FROM priced p
WHERE p.sku_name ILIKE '%PHOTON%'
AND p.billing_origin_product IN ('ALL_PURPOSE','JOBS_COMPUTE')
AND p.usage_metadata.cluster_id IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY p.usage_metadata.cluster_id
HAVING SUM(p.usd) > 0
ORDER BY photon_premium_at_risk_30d_usd DESC;
Confirm Photon is live and worth keeping with databricks-workspace-mcp
clusters_get (REST runtime_engine — a config-plane field, not a system column);
for DLT pipelines use pipelines_get (spec.photon / serverless / edition). See
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/dlt-tier-cost-tradeoffs.md
when the leak touches DLT/serverless tiers.
Pass each category's query result to the deterministic ranker — the LLM does NOT do
the arithmetic. Each leak object carries a kind field
(confirmed / estimated / at-risk) so the renderer can split the headline into
confirmed-recoverable vs estimated/at-risk-pending-review and stamp a Confidence
column. The script sums per-category figures by kind, ranks descending by monthly
dollar impact, annualizes the headline and #1 line, stamps the trailing-30-day window
end date, and renders the CFO-grokkable report.
# Per-category results and the rendered report are RUNTIME outputs — they go to
# a working dir ($OUT), never the skill package. Steps 3–6 wrote leak-*.json here.
OUT="${OUT:-$(pwd)/cost-leak-out}" && mkdir -p "$OUT"
jq -s '.' "$OUT"/leak-*.json | \
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/rank-and-report.py" \
--monthly-spend 100000 \
--window-end "$WINDOW_END_DATE" \
--out "$OUT/cost-leak-report.md"
Use Glob to collect the per-category leak-*.json results, Write the rendered
report, and Edit it if the user wants the headline spend rescaled. Render the
output using the verbatim template in
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/cfo-output-format.md.
$OUT/cost-leak-report.md in the working dir) leading
with a split headline that never sums confirmed and unconfirmed dollars under
one verb — ### A $<spend>/month workspace is burning **~$<confirmed>/month** (confirmed), plus up to **~$<at-risk>/month** pending review — each with its
~$<annualized>/year companion.Trailing 30 days ending <window-end>) so every figure has an explicit calendar
window, not just a /month cadence label.Confidence column
(# | Where it's leaking | $/month | Confidence | The fix), one row per category,
ranked highest dollar impact first, $/month right-aligned, each fix a single
config change. Root-cause cells use plain-business language — no raw DBU unit in
the CFO-visible text (DBU detail stays in the per-leak detail artifacts).system.billing.usage, while
overprovision (estimated) and Photon premium (at-risk) are labeled as modeled.databricks-workspace-mcp
and the underlying $/DBU rates for engineers.| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
PERMISSION_DENIED on system.billing.usage | Metastore-admin grant chain missing | Run Step 1; report the exact GRANT USE CATALOG / USE SCHEMA / SELECT chain from system-tables-setup.md. Stop, do not continue. |
| CLI not authenticated / token expired | No valid DATABRICKS_HOST + token | Re-run databricks auth login; verify with databricks current-user me. |
Empty / unset DATABRICKS_WAREHOUSE_ID | Required warehouse for statement execution not set | Set DATABRICKS_WAREHOUSE_ID to a running SQL warehouse before Step 1. |
list_prices join returns NULL usd | Custom/negotiated pricing not in list_prices, or usage_unit mismatch | Join on sku_name AND usage_unit within the price window with currency_code='USD'; if still NULL, use the customer's contracted rate card from references/cost-leak-categories.md. |
| Workspace MCP missing | Server not registered | Degrade gracefully: report it absent, run the dollar half, accept pasted config for corroboration. Never fail silently mid-flow. |
node_timeline empty for a cluster | Serverless/short-lived compute, or monitoring lag | Skip Leak 3 for that cluster; note "utilization unavailable" rather than reporting $0 overprovision. |
Untagged spend / no cluster_name | Clusters lack CostCenter/Team tags | Attribute by cluster_id; flag attribution as incomplete in the report footer. |
Runs the full pipeline. The grant check passes, the four scans return rows, and the ranker emits the CFO report with a split, confidence-stamped headline:
### A $100K/month Databricks workspace is burning **~$19,000/month** (confirmed), plus up to **~$8,000/month** pending review
Trailing 30 days ending 2026-06-22. Confirmed ~$228K/year; up to ~$96K/year more pending review. Every line below is one config change.
| # | Where it's leaking | $/month | Confidence | The fix |
|---|---|--:|---|---|
| 1 | Clusters that never shut themselves off — paying around the clock for compute nobody is using | **$12,000** | Confirmed | Set auto-shutoff (e.g. 30 min) |
| 2 | Scheduled batch jobs running on the premium notebook tier — ~3.6× the batch rate for identical work | **$7,000** | Confirmed | Move job clusters to the batch tier |
| 3 | Clusters sized for peak, idling most of the time — typically 30–50% oversized | **$5,000** | Estimated | Turn on autoscaling, drop the floor |
| 4 | Paying a ~2× speed-engine premium on jobs that don't run faster | **$3,000** | At-risk | Turn off the speed engine where it adds no gain |
**The #1 line alone — idle clusters (confirmed) — is ~$144K/year, fixed in one setting.**
User asks "find idle clusters wasting money." The skill runs Step 3 only, joins the
spend to clusters_get, and reports each auto_termination_minutes = 0 cluster with
its 30-day idle spend and the live idle gap from clusters_events.
User asks "are any jobs on the wrong compute?" Step 4 returns each job_id running
on All-Purpose with potential_savings_30d_usd, corroborated by clusters_get
confirming cluster_source is not JOB — the single fix is "move to Jobs Compute."
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/cost-leak-categories.md — the four leak categories: definition, real detection SQL, FinOps root cause, remediation.${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/cfo-output-format.md — verbatim CFO report template + the 90-second-skim rules.${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/system-tables-setup.md — metastore-admin grant chain + access verification.${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/dlt-tier-cost-tradeoffs.md — DLT / serverless / Photon cost-tier encyclopedia, loaded on demand.
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!