复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
AI agents skip steps.
"Looks correct" replaces running tests. "Trivial change" replaces verification. The agent confidently ships broken code because nothing structurally prevented it from skipping the work.
Harnesses have a second problem: given only a skill list, they do not route eagerly enough, or correctly enough. Good skills sit unused. So this toolkit connects the skills, agents, and workflows we want directly into the harness, automatically. You don't have to understand what is here. Say what you want in plain English and you get all the value we have put into it: the right specialist with the right methodology, behind gates that demand exit codes, not assertions.
44 domain agents, 122 workflow skills, 78 hooks, 136 scripts. Agents carry knowledge, skills enforce methodology, hooks block incomplete work, scripts handle determinism.
Works across Claude Code (/do), Codex ($do), Factory (/do), Reasonix (/do).
$ claude
> /do debug this Go test
Routing: go-engineer + systematic-debugging
Phase 1/4: Reproduce: running test, capturing failure...
Phase 2/4: Hypothesize: 3 candidates from stack trace...
Phase 3/4: Verify: isolated root cause in connection pool timeout
Phase 4/4: Fix: patch applied, test passing, PR opened
✓ Delivered: PR #847, fix connection pool timeout in health check
The router reads intent, picks a Go agent paired with a debugging skill, and runs the full lifecycle. You typed one sentence. The system did the rest.
ROUTE PLAN EXECUTE VERIFY DELIVER RECORD
┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐
│ /do │───▶│ Task │───▶│Agent │───▶│Tests │───▶│ PR │───▶│Route │
│Router│ │ Plan │ │+Skill│ │Gates │ │Branch│ │Result│
└──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘
This is the single thing that separates it from "agent with a system prompt."
| Agent Says | What Happens |
|---|---|
| "Code looks correct, skip tests" | Exit gate requires test output. Blocked. |
| "Trivial change, no verification" | Hook blocks completion without evidence. |
| "Similar to before" | Skill demands case-specific proof. |
| "User is in a hurry" | Protocol overrides time pressure. |
| "I'm confident" | Gate demands exit code, not assertion. |
Hooks fire automatically. Gates block completion. Skills encode counter-arguments at every skip-worthy step. The agent verifies or it doesn't finish.
For what I do, the difference is enormous. If you're doing simple single-file edits, maybe less so.
The same routing serves knowledge work. The content engine researches, drafts in a calibrated voice, validates against 397 AI patterns, and repurposes finished pieces for each platform. /html turns any request into a single self-contained HTML file: report, slide deck, prototype, data viz, diagram. Non-engineers who try the toolkit consistently name the HTML artifacts as the thing they love. No code, no setup beyond the installer.
Changes to the toolkit itself ship with evidence. New skills get blind A/B tests against a no-skill baseline before merge. Routing and writing-standard decisions carry measured verdicts; PHILOSOPHY.md cites the numbers. Experiments that lost go into the negative-results registry, what-didnt-work.md; the registry now covers routing reversals, unvalidated A/B citations, and disabled lint rules alongside the original program refutations.
The automated nightly evolution loop (/evolve, writes to evolution-reports/) ran regularly through mid-May 2026. It is currently dormant; recent evidence has come from manual PRs instead.
git clone https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent.git ~/vexjoy-agent
cd ~/vexjoy-agent
./install.sh
Links into ~/.claude/ and mirrors into ~/.codex/, ~/.factory/, ~/.reasonix/ — each mirror only when that runtime is detected (its command on PATH or its home dir already exists). The installer asks symlink (live updates via git pull) or copy (stable snapshot).
Want only part of the toolkit? Run ./install.sh --configure to pick which skills, agents, and hooks install, or copy .local.example/profile.yaml to .local/profile.yaml and edit. No profile file = full install, unchanged behavior. Credit: @thomasvan. Details: .local.example/README.md.
| CLI | Entry Point |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | /do |
| Codex | $do |
| Factory | /do |
| Reasonix | /do |
Full setup: docs/start-here.md
Mirrors agents, skills, and supported hooks into ~/.codex/. The original six-hook allowlist was correct for Codex v0.114, when tool hooks only intercepted Bash. Current support requires Codex v0.144.1+ and classifies the 74 Claude hook registrations as 26 native, 35 adapter-backed, and 13 unsupported (61 supported). These are registration counts, not unique hook files. The installer also preserves explicit per-subagent model routing for GPT-5.6 Sol by setting the MultiAgent V2 compatibility keys documented in openai/codex#31814.
Codex now exposes apply_patch to tool hooks. VexJoy's adapter converts each patch operation into the Write/Edit payload expected by existing guards, but it cannot intercept writes performed through unified_exec, unmatched MCP tools, WebSearch, or other unsupported tool paths. PreCompact and Stop adapters also receive less telemetry than Claude Code: Codex does not provide Claude's conversation_history or session_data. This is expanded compatibility, not full Claude parity.
After install or any hook-definition change, run /hooks in Codex and review the new definitions before trusting them. Codex hash-trusts hook commands and skips changed, unreviewed definitions.
Gemini CLI support removed (deprecated upstream, transitioned to Antigravity CLI); Antigravity support pending CLI maturity. Per Google's transition announcement, Gemini CLI stops serving requests on 2026-06-18 for Google AI Pro / Ultra and free Gemini Code Assist for individuals. Gemini API integrations (image-gen backends, sprite pipeline, GEMINI_API_KEY) are unaffected and stay in the toolkit.
If a prior install mirrored into ~/.gemini/, remove the stale mirrors with:
rm -rf ~/.gemini/skills ~/.gemini/agents ~/.gemini/hooks ~/.gemini/scripts ~/.gemini/antigravity/plugins/vexjoy-agent
Mirrors agents (as "droids"), skills, and all hooks into ~/.factory/. Hook config merges into ~/.factory/settings.json with paths rewritten.
Mirrors skills, scripts, and the allowlisted hooks (scripts/reasonix-hooks-allowlist.txt) into ~/.reasonix/ (no agent or custom-command surface, so neither is installed; the /do router rides in as a skill). Reasonix fires only 4 events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, UserPromptSubmit, Stop), so only hooks for those events are allowlisted. Hook config is written to the hooks key of ~/.reasonix/settings.json in Reasonix's native flat shape (one entry per hook, match regex over the tool name); the generator builds absolute python3 commands, so no path rewrite is applied. MCP/model/permissions in ~/.reasonix/config.json are user-owned and left untouched.
The toolkit supplies its own routing, domain knowledge, methodology, and enforcement. The default system prompt duplicates most of that.
claude --system-prompt "."
Strips built-in tool-use instructions. The toolkit's agents, skills, hooks, and CLAUDE.md provide equivalent coverage.
| Layer | Count | Does |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | 44 | Domain knowledge: idiom tables, failure mode catalogs, error-to-fix mappings |
| Skills | 122 | Phased methodology with gates. Can't skip steps. Each phase has exit criteria requiring evidence. |
| Hooks | 78 | Fire on lifecycle events. Block incomplete work. Zero LLM cost. |
| Scripts | 136 | Determinism: test runners, linters, validators. No LLM judgment. |
Full skill catalog: docs/skills.md.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SKILL.md │
│ ┌─ Frontmatter ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ triggers, pairs_with, success-criteria │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ Reference Loading Table (conditional imports) │
│ Phased Instructions (numbered, with gates) │
│ Verification (evidence requirements) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
A game built entirely by Claude Code using these agents, skills, and pipelines:
I just want to use it Install, learn /do, done.
I do knowledge work Writing, research, data analysis, moderation, HTML artifacts. No code.
I'm a developer Architecture, extension points, adding agents and skills.
I'm an AI power user Routing tables, pipelines, hooks, telemetry DB.
I'm an AI agent Machine-dense inventory. Tables, paths, schemas.
I'm on LinkedIn 🚀 Thought leadership. Agree? 👇
Full design philosophy: PHILOSOPHY.md
One report-only script surfaces upkeep work; it prints a digest and never edits, deletes, or blocks.
python3 scripts/stale-skill-scan.py --top 20 ranks stale skills and agents as pruning candidates. Run it quarterly; see docs/deprecation-template.md.Scheduled work follows the same boundary as everything else: judgment uses agents; repeatable plumbing uses scripts.
| Need | Use |
|---|---|
| Run a deterministic command on a schedule | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with runner: "command" |
| Run an agent judgment on a schedule, webhook, or file change | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with the default runner: "claude" |
| Install or remove a user crontab entry safely | scripts/crontab-manager.py |
| Audit shell cron reliability | cron-automation |
| Keep one interactive objective moving until criteria verify | objective-loop |
See CONTRIBUTING.md.
MIT. See LICENSE.
name: dev-branch-deploy
description: Drive the Hermes/Maia Concourse dev-branch deploy workflow — test stack changes in a live lab before merging to master. Use for "dev branch", "deploy to dev", "hermes-dev-branch", "maia-dev-branch", "test in labs", "dev lane". Covers both the hermes and maia stacks.
version: 1.0.0
routing:
triggers:
- dev branch
- dev-branch
- deploy to dev
- dev lane
- hermes-dev-branch
- maia-dev-branch
- test in labs
- sync master to dev
pairs_with:
- pr-workflow
complexity: Medium
category: infrastructureTest a Hermes or Maia stack change in a live lab region before merging to master, using the
pipeline's parallel dev lane. One workflow, two stacks — parametrized by stack.
Concourse pins a git branch: per resource at pipeline-definition time; you can't override it at
trigger time. So normally you must merge to master to see a chart/secrets change run in a lab.
The dev lane adds a second set of jobs pointed at <stack>-dev-branch, so you deploy and validate
in a real lab region with no risk to master or production.
Everything below is identical between stacks except these values.
| Param | hermes | maia |
|---|---|---|
| Dev branch | hermes-dev-branch | maia-dev-branch |
| fly target | ci-monitoring | monitoring |
| Concourse | https://ci1.eu-de-2.cloud.sap | https://ci.eu-de-2.cloud.sap |
| Pipeline dir | ci/hermes/ in cc/secrets | ci/maia/ in cc/secrets |
set-pipeline vars | — | --load-vars-from vars.yaml |
| Chart | openstack/hermes | openstack/maia |
Constants (both stacks):
monitoringqa-de-1, qa-de-2, qa-de-3, eu-de-3cc/secrets (GHE github.wdf.sap.corp) and sapcc/helm-charts (github.com)cc/secrets clone: ~/gh/secrets| Lane | Branch | Role |
|---|---|---|
labs | master | Guards production-branch health. Never break it. |
dev | <stack>-dev-branch | Sandbox: validate a feature in a real lab before master. |
Both deploy to the same lab regions, independently. Production lanes (bronze/silver/gold/global)
are untouched by this workflow.
Dev lane = paired git resources + a dev job group.
secrets-dev.git → <stack>-dev-branch (twin of secrets.git on master)helm-charts-dev.git → <stack>-dev-branch (twin of helm-charts.git on master)kube-secrets, credentials.Dev jobs run the same helm upgrade as prod but input-map the dev resources over prod:
input_mapping:
helm-charts.git: helm-charts-dev.git
secrets.git: secrets-dev.git
Dev group jobs:
| Job | Purpose |
|---|---|
deploy-all-dev | Manual fan-out trigger for the whole dev lane |
deploy-to-dev-<region> | helm upgrade per lab region, from the dev branch |
sync-master-to-dev | Keep the dev branch caught up with master |
Confirm the dev branch exists on both repos and the pipeline is actually wired. Substitute
<stack> = hermes or maia.
STACK=hermes # or: maia
DEVBRANCH=${STACK}-dev-branch
# 1. Dev branch on internal secrets repo
git -C ~/gh/secrets ls-remote --heads origin "$DEVBRANCH"
# 2. Dev branch on public helm-charts repo
git ls-remote --heads https://github.com/sapcc/helm-charts.git "$DEVBRANCH"
# 3. Is the dev lane present in the generated pipeline? (erb must define the dev group)
grep -n "helm-charts-dev.git\|deploy-all-dev\|${DEVBRANCH}" ~/gh/secrets/ci/${STACK}/pipeline.yaml.erb
Decision logic:
ls-remote return a SHA and grep shows the dev group → dev lane is ready, proceed.Hermes is fully wired (branch on both repos, dev group live on master). Maia's dev lane may still be on the unmerged branch
add-maia-dev-group, andmaia-dev-branchmay not exist yet — the preflight catches this.
master in helm-charts and/or secrets as needed.<stack>-dev-branch (merge, never force-push).
git -C ~/gh/secrets fetch origin
git -C ~/gh/secrets checkout "$DEVBRANCH"
git -C ~/gh/secrets merge --no-ff origin/<feature-branch>
git -C ~/gh/secrets push origin "$DEVBRANCH"
deploy-to-dev-<region> goes green across all lab regions — this is the proof.
fly -t <target> watch -j ${STACK}/deploy-to-dev-qa-de-1
Or trigger the whole lane manually:
fly -t <target> trigger-job -j ${STACK}/deploy-all-dev -w
master as normal (via PR).labs lane stays healthy on master.Before starting new dev work, sync the dev branch to master so you're testing against current state:
fly -t <target> trigger-job -j ${STACK}/sync-master-to-dev -w
(Or merge origin/master into the dev branch locally and push — never force-push.)
The pipeline is ERB-generated, then pushed with fly. Log in first: fly -t <target> login.
Hermes:
cd ~/gh/secrets/ci/hermes
erb pipeline.yaml.erb > pipeline.yaml
fly -t ci-monitoring set-pipeline -p hermes -c pipeline.yaml
Maia:
cd ~/gh/secrets/ci/maia
erb pipeline.yaml.erb > pipeline.yaml
fly -t monitoring set-pipeline -p maia -c pipeline.yaml --load-vars-from vars.yaml
labs — it tracks master only and gates production.<stack>-dev-branch. It's a shared integration branch.| Symptom | Cause / fix |
|---|---|
ls-remote returns nothing for the dev branch | Branch not created on that repo. Create <stack>-dev-branch on both cc/secrets and sapcc/helm-charts before deploying. |
grep finds no deploy-all-dev in erb | Dev-lane pipeline change not merged/generated. Merge it, erb > pipeline.yaml, fly set-pipeline. |
deploy-to-dev-* never triggers | Confirm the change landed on <stack>-dev-branch (not just a feature branch); check the *-dev.git resource in Concourse is finding the commit. |
fly: unknown target | fly -t <target> login first. Hermes=ci-monitoring, Maia=monitoring. |
| Dev deploy passes but master breaks after merge | The feature diverged from what was tested on dev — re-sync dev to master and re-validate before re-merging. |
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!