复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
AI agents skip steps.
"Looks correct" replaces running tests. "Trivial change" replaces verification. The agent confidently ships broken code because nothing structurally prevented it from skipping the work.
Harnesses have a second problem: given only a skill list, they do not route eagerly enough, or correctly enough. Good skills sit unused. So this toolkit connects the skills, agents, and workflows we want directly into the harness, automatically. You don't have to understand what is here. Say what you want in plain English and you get all the value we have put into it: the right specialist with the right methodology, behind gates that demand exit codes, not assertions.
44 domain agents, 122 workflow skills, 78 hooks, 136 scripts. Agents carry knowledge, skills enforce methodology, hooks block incomplete work, scripts handle determinism.
Works across Claude Code (/do), Codex ($do), Factory (/do), Reasonix (/do).
$ claude
> /do debug this Go test
Routing: go-engineer + systematic-debugging
Phase 1/4: Reproduce: running test, capturing failure...
Phase 2/4: Hypothesize: 3 candidates from stack trace...
Phase 3/4: Verify: isolated root cause in connection pool timeout
Phase 4/4: Fix: patch applied, test passing, PR opened
✓ Delivered: PR #847, fix connection pool timeout in health check
The router reads intent, picks a Go agent paired with a debugging skill, and runs the full lifecycle. You typed one sentence. The system did the rest.
ROUTE PLAN EXECUTE VERIFY DELIVER RECORD
┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐
│ /do │───▶│ Task │───▶│Agent │───▶│Tests │───▶│ PR │───▶│Route │
│Router│ │ Plan │ │+Skill│ │Gates │ │Branch│ │Result│
└──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘
This is the single thing that separates it from "agent with a system prompt."
| Agent Says | What Happens |
|---|---|
| "Code looks correct, skip tests" | Exit gate requires test output. Blocked. |
| "Trivial change, no verification" | Hook blocks completion without evidence. |
| "Similar to before" | Skill demands case-specific proof. |
| "User is in a hurry" | Protocol overrides time pressure. |
| "I'm confident" | Gate demands exit code, not assertion. |
Hooks fire automatically. Gates block completion. Skills encode counter-arguments at every skip-worthy step. The agent verifies or it doesn't finish.
For what I do, the difference is enormous. If you're doing simple single-file edits, maybe less so.
The same routing serves knowledge work. The content engine researches, drafts in a calibrated voice, validates against 397 AI patterns, and repurposes finished pieces for each platform. /html turns any request into a single self-contained HTML file: report, slide deck, prototype, data viz, diagram. Non-engineers who try the toolkit consistently name the HTML artifacts as the thing they love. No code, no setup beyond the installer.
Changes to the toolkit itself ship with evidence. New skills get blind A/B tests against a no-skill baseline before merge. Routing and writing-standard decisions carry measured verdicts; PHILOSOPHY.md cites the numbers. Experiments that lost go into the negative-results registry, what-didnt-work.md; the registry now covers routing reversals, unvalidated A/B citations, and disabled lint rules alongside the original program refutations.
The automated nightly evolution loop (/evolve, writes to evolution-reports/) ran regularly through mid-May 2026. It is currently dormant; recent evidence has come from manual PRs instead.
git clone https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent.git ~/vexjoy-agent
cd ~/vexjoy-agent
./install.sh
Links into ~/.claude/ and mirrors into ~/.codex/, ~/.factory/, ~/.reasonix/ — each mirror only when that runtime is detected (its command on PATH or its home dir already exists). The installer asks symlink (live updates via git pull) or copy (stable snapshot).
Want only part of the toolkit? Run ./install.sh --configure to pick which skills, agents, and hooks install, or copy .local.example/profile.yaml to .local/profile.yaml and edit. No profile file = full install, unchanged behavior. Credit: @thomasvan. Details: .local.example/README.md.
| CLI | Entry Point |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | /do |
| Codex | $do |
| Factory | /do |
| Reasonix | /do |
Full setup: docs/start-here.md
Mirrors agents, skills, and supported hooks into ~/.codex/. The original six-hook allowlist was correct for Codex v0.114, when tool hooks only intercepted Bash. Current support requires Codex v0.144.1+ and classifies the 74 Claude hook registrations as 26 native, 35 adapter-backed, and 13 unsupported (61 supported). These are registration counts, not unique hook files. The installer also preserves explicit per-subagent model routing for GPT-5.6 Sol by setting the MultiAgent V2 compatibility keys documented in openai/codex#31814.
Codex now exposes apply_patch to tool hooks. VexJoy's adapter converts each patch operation into the Write/Edit payload expected by existing guards, but it cannot intercept writes performed through unified_exec, unmatched MCP tools, WebSearch, or other unsupported tool paths. PreCompact and Stop adapters also receive less telemetry than Claude Code: Codex does not provide Claude's conversation_history or session_data. This is expanded compatibility, not full Claude parity.
After install or any hook-definition change, run /hooks in Codex and review the new definitions before trusting them. Codex hash-trusts hook commands and skips changed, unreviewed definitions.
Gemini CLI support removed (deprecated upstream, transitioned to Antigravity CLI); Antigravity support pending CLI maturity. Per Google's transition announcement, Gemini CLI stops serving requests on 2026-06-18 for Google AI Pro / Ultra and free Gemini Code Assist for individuals. Gemini API integrations (image-gen backends, sprite pipeline, GEMINI_API_KEY) are unaffected and stay in the toolkit.
If a prior install mirrored into ~/.gemini/, remove the stale mirrors with:
rm -rf ~/.gemini/skills ~/.gemini/agents ~/.gemini/hooks ~/.gemini/scripts ~/.gemini/antigravity/plugins/vexjoy-agent
Mirrors agents (as "droids"), skills, and all hooks into ~/.factory/. Hook config merges into ~/.factory/settings.json with paths rewritten.
Mirrors skills, scripts, and the allowlisted hooks (scripts/reasonix-hooks-allowlist.txt) into ~/.reasonix/ (no agent or custom-command surface, so neither is installed; the /do router rides in as a skill). Reasonix fires only 4 events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, UserPromptSubmit, Stop), so only hooks for those events are allowlisted. Hook config is written to the hooks key of ~/.reasonix/settings.json in Reasonix's native flat shape (one entry per hook, match regex over the tool name); the generator builds absolute python3 commands, so no path rewrite is applied. MCP/model/permissions in ~/.reasonix/config.json are user-owned and left untouched.
The toolkit supplies its own routing, domain knowledge, methodology, and enforcement. The default system prompt duplicates most of that.
claude --system-prompt "."
Strips built-in tool-use instructions. The toolkit's agents, skills, hooks, and CLAUDE.md provide equivalent coverage.
| Layer | Count | Does |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | 44 | Domain knowledge: idiom tables, failure mode catalogs, error-to-fix mappings |
| Skills | 122 | Phased methodology with gates. Can't skip steps. Each phase has exit criteria requiring evidence. |
| Hooks | 78 | Fire on lifecycle events. Block incomplete work. Zero LLM cost. |
| Scripts | 136 | Determinism: test runners, linters, validators. No LLM judgment. |
Full skill catalog: docs/skills.md.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SKILL.md │
│ ┌─ Frontmatter ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ triggers, pairs_with, success-criteria │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ Reference Loading Table (conditional imports) │
│ Phased Instructions (numbered, with gates) │
│ Verification (evidence requirements) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
A game built entirely by Claude Code using these agents, skills, and pipelines:
I just want to use it Install, learn /do, done.
I do knowledge work Writing, research, data analysis, moderation, HTML artifacts. No code.
I'm a developer Architecture, extension points, adding agents and skills.
I'm an AI power user Routing tables, pipelines, hooks, telemetry DB.
I'm an AI agent Machine-dense inventory. Tables, paths, schemas.
I'm on LinkedIn 🚀 Thought leadership. Agree? 👇
Full design philosophy: PHILOSOPHY.md
One report-only script surfaces upkeep work; it prints a digest and never edits, deletes, or blocks.
python3 scripts/stale-skill-scan.py --top 20 ranks stale skills and agents as pruning candidates. Run it quarterly; see docs/deprecation-template.md.Scheduled work follows the same boundary as everything else: judgment uses agents; repeatable plumbing uses scripts.
| Need | Use |
|---|---|
| Run a deterministic command on a schedule | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with runner: "command" |
| Run an agent judgment on a schedule, webhook, or file change | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with the default runner: "claude" |
| Install or remove a user crontab entry safely | scripts/crontab-manager.py |
| Audit shell cron reliability | cron-automation |
| Keep one interactive objective moving until criteria verify | objective-loop |
See CONTRIBUTING.md.
MIT. See LICENSE.
name: endpoint-validator
promoted_to: service-health-check
description: "Deterministic API endpoint validation with pass/fail reporting."
user-invocable: false
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Write
- Glob
- Edit
routing:
triggers:
- "validate endpoints"
- "smoke test API"
- "health check endpoints"
- "test endpoint"
- "check API"
- "smoke test"
category: infrastructure
not_for: "process/service uptime or daemon liveness (use service-health-check); only HTTP/API endpoint request validation"
pairs_with:
- service-health-check
- e2e-testingDeterministic HTTP endpoint validation following a Discover, Validate, Report pattern. Finds endpoints, tests each against expectations, and produces machine-readable results with clear pass/fail verdicts and CI-compatible exit codes.
| Signal | Load These Files | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Security header WARNs, HSTS/CSP/X-Frame issues | security-headers.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
| Config errors, hardcoded IPs, timeout problems | endpoint-config-preferred-patterns.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
| 401/403 failures, Bearer/API-key/cookie auth | auth-endpoint-patterns.md | Routes to the matching deep reference |
Goal: Locate or receive endpoint definitions before making any requests.
Step 1: Read repository CLAUDE.md
Check for and follow any repository-level CLAUDE.md before running validation. It may contain base URL conventions, environment variable names, or endpoint paths relevant to the project.
Step 2: Search for endpoint configuration
Look for definitions in priority order:
endpoints.json in project roottests/endpoints.jsonPrefer config files checked into version control over ad-hoc endpoint lists. Manually listing endpoints every run leads to drift and missed endpoints.
Step 3: Parse and validate configuration
Configuration must contain base_url and at least one endpoint:
{
"base_url": "http://localhost:8000",
"endpoints": [
{"path": "/health", "expect_status": 200},
{"path": "/api/v1/users", "expect_key": "data", "timeout": 10},
{"path": "/api/v1/search?q=test", "max_time": 2.0}
]
}
Each endpoint supports these fields:
path (required): URL path appended to base_urlexpect_status (default: 200): Expected HTTP status codeexpect_key (optional): Top-level JSON key that must exist in response. Only top-level key presence is checked -- full JSON schema validation is out of scope.timeout (default: 5): Request timeout in seconds. The 5-second default prevents hanging on unresponsive endpoints.max_time (optional): Fail if response exceeds this threshold in secondsmethod (optional): HTTP method. Defaults to GET. POST/PUT/DELETE require explicit configuration with a request body -- send mutating requests only when the user explicitly configures them.headers (optional): Additional headers per endpoint (e.g., Accept, Content-Type, Authorization)If base_url points to a production host and the config includes POST/PUT/DELETE endpoints, warn the user before proceeding. Mutating production data or triggering rate limits during a smoke test is a serious risk. Use staging environments for write operations; reserve production for GET-only health checks.
Use hostnames or environment variables instead of hardcoded IP addresses in base_url (e.g., http://192.168.1.42:8000). They break on every other machine and CI environment. Use localhost with a configurable port or environment variables instead.
Step 4: Confirm base URL is reachable
Make a single request to base_url before running the full suite. If unreachable, report immediately rather than failing every endpoint individually.
Gate: Configuration parsed, base URL reachable, at least one endpoint defined. Proceed only when gate passes.
Verification means execution, not reasoning. Run the command. Do not reason about whether the command would pass. Do not summarize the expected output. Execute the check, paste the exit code, paste the relevant output. A verification phase that produces a verdict without an observed tool result is not a verification — it is a guess with a rigor aesthetic.
Goal: Test each endpoint against its expected criteria and collect structured results.
Step 1: Execute requests sequentially
Test endpoints one at a time for predictable, reproducible output. For each endpoint:
base_url + pathThis skill sends one request per endpoint. It is not a load tester or stress tester -- it validates contract compliance, not throughput.
Step 2: Evaluate against expectations
For each response, check in order:
expect_status? If not, mark FAIL.expect_key set, parse JSON and check key exists. If missing or not valid JSON, mark FAIL.max_time set and elapsed exceeds it, mark SLOW. Flag slow endpoints -- they indicate degradation that becomes failure under load.Strict-Transport-Security -- HSTS enforcement (expected on HTTPS endpoints)Content-Security-Policy -- XSS mitigationX-Content-Type-Options -- should be nosniffX-Frame-Options -- clickjacking prevention (or CSP frame-ancestors)Skip security header checks for localhost/127.0.0.1 endpoints (development environments typically omit these). Only check on non-localhost base URLs unless explicitly configured.
Step 3: Handle failures gracefully
expect_key set: Record as FAIL with "Invalid JSON response"Gate: All endpoints tested. Every result has a clear PASS, FAIL, or SLOW verdict. Proceed only when gate passes.
Goal: Produce structured, machine-readable output with summary statistics.
Step 1: Format individual results
ENDPOINT VALIDATION REPORT
==========================
Base URL: http://localhost:8000
Endpoints: 15 tested
RESULTS:
/api/health 200 OK 45ms
/api/users 200 OK 123ms
/api/products 500 FAIL "Internal Server Error"
/api/slow 200 SLOW 3.2s > 2.0s threshold
SECURITY HEADERS (non-localhost only):
/api/health WARN Missing: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options
/api/users OK All security headers present
/api/products SKIP (endpoint failed)
Step 2: Produce summary
SUMMARY:
Passed: 13/15 (86.7%)
Failed: 1 (status error)
Slow: 1 (exceeded threshold)
Security header warnings: 3 endpoints missing headers
Step 3: Set exit code
max_time was set)Gate: Report printed, exit code set. Validation complete.
User says: "Validate all endpoints before we deploy" Actions:
endpoints.json in project root (DISCOVER)User says: "Check if the API is still working after the database migration" Actions:
Cause: Service not running, wrong port, or network issue Solution:
ps aux, docker ps, or equivalent)netstat -tlnp or ss -tlnp)Cause: Service overwhelmed, wrong host, or proxy misconfiguration Solution:
curl -vCause: Endpoint returns HTML, XML, or empty body instead of JSON Solution:
expect_key if endpoint legitimately returns non-JSON| Task Type | Load This Reference |
|---|---|
| Security header WARNs, HSTS/CSP/X-Frame issues | references/security-headers.md |
| Config errors, hardcoded IPs, timeout problems | references/endpoint-config-preferred-patterns.md |
| 401/403 failures, Bearer/API-key/cookie auth | references/auth-endpoint-patterns.md |
# GitHub Actions example
# TODO: scripts/validate_endpoints.py not yet implemented
# Manual alternative: use curl to validate endpoints from endpoints.json
- name: Validate API endpoints
run: |
jq -r '.endpoints[].path' endpoints.json | while read path; do
curl -sf "$BASE_URL$path" > /dev/null && echo "PASS: $path" || echo "FAIL: $path"
done
# Pre-deployment gate
# TODO: scripts/validate_endpoints.py not yet implemented
# Manual alternative: iterate endpoints.json with curl
jq -r '.endpoints[].path' endpoints.json | while read path; do
curl -sf "http://localhost:8000$path" > /dev/null || { echo "FAIL: $path"; exit 1; }
done
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!