复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
GitHub stars License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 PRs Welcome Version Claude Code Plugin Skills
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ ║
║ ██████╗ ███╗ ███╗ ███████╗██╗ ██╗██╗██╗ ██╗ ███████╗
║ ██╔══██╗████╗ ████║ ██╔════╝██║ ██╔╝██║██║ ██║ ██╔════╝
║ ██████╔╝██╔████╔██║ ███████╗█████╔╝ ██║██║ ██║ ███████╗
║ ██╔═══╝ ██║╚██╔╝██║ ╚════██║██╔═██╗ ██║██║ ██║ ╚════██║
║ ██║ ██║ ╚═╝ ██║ ███████║██║ ██╗██║███████╗███████╗███████║
║ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚══════╝╚═╝ ╚═╝╚═╝╚══════╝╚══════╝╚══════╝
║ ║
║ 77 battle-tested skills + 6 command workflows ║
║ Claude Code • Cursor • Codex • n8n • OpenClaw • and more ... ║
║ ║
║ v0.84 • August 10, 2026 • CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
77 battle-tested PM frameworks, ready for Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, and any agent that can read structured knowledge.
Generic AI output is a PM's worst enemy. When you tell your agent "write a PRD" without shared context, you get a generic document that no stakeholder trusts and no engineer can act on.
This library gives both you and your AI agent the same professional foundation: the why behind each framework, the failure modes to avoid, and the judgment to apply them correctly. You stop repeating yourself. Your agent stops guessing. The work gets better.
The goal is dual — functional and pedagogic in equal measure. Skills equip agents to do PM work at a professional level, and they teach the human PM the reasoning behind each framework — so you can explain it, adapt it, and pass it on. Neither is a byproduct of the other.
Navigate by what you're actually trying to accomplish:
Framing and strategy
Stakeholder alignment
Customer discovery and research
Prioritization and roadmapping
Writing PM deliverables
Validation and experimentation
Finance and growth
Market and competitive intelligence
Aging products: extend, replace, or retire
Career and leadership transitions
AI product work
Choose your setup:
| I use... | Get this | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Desktop or Claude Web | pm-skills-starter-pack.zip | Unzip, then upload the individual skill ZIPs to Claude Skills |
| Claude Code | Plugin marketplace | claude /plugin marketplace add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills |
| Codex | pm-skills-codex.zip | Installs .agents/skills and AGENTS.md |
| Not sure | pm-skills-starter-pack.zip | Start here |
All downloads: GitHub Releases
Each pack below is a ZIP of upload-ready skill ZIPs — unzip, then upload individuals to Claude Skills:
| Pack | Download | What's inside |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | pm-skills-starter-pack.zip | Core skills across all categories |
| Discovery | 02-discovery-pack.zip | Research, interviewing, synthesis |
| Strategy | 03-strategy-pack.zip | Positioning, roadmapping, prioritization |
| Delivery | 04-delivery-pack.zip | PRDs, stories, epics |
| AI PM | 05-ai-pm-pack.zip | Context engineering, orchestration, readiness |
| Market Intel | 06-market-intel-pack.zip | The full Market Intelligence Suite: disciplines, investigation chain, frameworks, monitors |
| Lifecycle & EOL | 07-lifecycle-eol-pack.zip | Aging products: extend, replace, or retire — plus the full sunset process |
| All skills | 99-all-skills-pack.zip | All 77 skills |
Not ready to wire skills into your agent setup? Run the local playground first and kick the tires in your browser.
pip install -r app/requirements.txt
streamlit run app/main.py
What you can do:
Multi-provider support: Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama. API keys via environment variables only (no in-app key entry).
Docs: app/STREAMLIT_INTERFACE.md · app/.env.example
Feedback welcome via GitHub Issues or LinkedIn.
Skills are organized in three tiers that build on each other:
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ WORKFLOW SKILLS (19) │
│ Complete end-to-end PM processes (days to weeks) │
│ Example: run a full discovery cycle or write a PRD │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ orchestrates
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INTERACTIVE SKILLS (27) │
│ Guided discovery — 3-5 questions, then recommendations│
│ Example: "Which prioritization framework fits here?" │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ uses
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ COMPONENT SKILLS (24) │
│ Templates for specific PM deliverables (30-90 min) │
│ Example: write a user story with acceptance criteria │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Interactive skills use an Adaptive Decision Ladder. Instead of dumping a framework at you, an interactive skill asks 3-5 targeted questions about your specific context, then offers numbered recommendations — each with a clear "use this when" rationale. You pick a path. The skill executes it and explains the why as it goes. If you want to just learn the framework without doing the work, you can ask that too — the skill coaches you either way. This is ABC — Always Be Coaching — in practice.
Full catalog: catalog/INDEX.md — all 77 skills with descriptions, or browse skills/ directly.
Every SKILL.md follows the same structure:
| Section | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Frontmatter | name, description, type, intent, best_for, scenarios |
| Purpose | What this skill does and when to reach for it |
| Input | What you can bring (with example invocations) — inline input is used, not re-asked, and arriving empty-handed is fine: the skill walks you through it |
| Key Concepts | Frameworks, definitions, anti-patterns — with vocabulary explained |
| Application | Step-by-step instructions an agent (or human) can follow |
| Examples | Real-world cases showing both good and bad versions |
| Common Pitfalls | Named failure modes with consequences and corrections |
| References | Related skills and external frameworks |
The best_for frontmatter field lists 3-5 specific scenarios where the skill is most useful — helpful for quickly scanning whether a skill fits your situation.
Why no $ARGUMENTS templating? Other skill libraries use Claude Code's $ARGUMENTS substitution for input. We deliberately don't: it only expands in Claude Code (it renders as literal syntax in Claude Desktop/Web, Codex, and the Streamlit playground), and it teaches the human reader nothing. Instead, every skill has a plain-language ## Input section that works on every runtime — and makes clear you can show up with full context, partial context, or nothing at all and be guided through the rest. Full rationale in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Claude Code · Claude Desktop · Claude Web · OpenAI Codex · ChatGPT · Cursor · Windsurf · n8n · LangFlow · CrewAI · Gemini · any agent that reads structured markdown
See docs/Platform Guides for PMs.md for platform-specific setup.
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Using PM Skills 101 | Beginner-friendly orientation — setup without technical overload |
| Platform Guides for PMs | Tool-by-tool setup chooser for every supported platform |
| Using PM Skills with Claude | Claude Code + GitHub ZIP upload for Claude Desktop/Web |
| Using PM Skills with Codex | Local workspace + GitHub-connected Codex on ChatGPT |
| Using PM Skills with ChatGPT | GitHub app, Custom GPT Knowledge, and Project-based usage |
| Using PM Skills with Slash Commands 101 | Turn skills into reusable slash commands like /pm-story |
| Add-a-Skill Utility Guide | End-to-end guide for generating and validating new skills |
| Market Intelligence Suite Summary | The 14-skill competitive/market research suite: disciplines, chain, and which skill to run when |
| Lifecycle & EOL Suite Summary | The 8-skill lifecycle/sunset suite: the three plays, the EOL chain, and right-sizing |
| Building PM Skills | How raw PM content gets distilled into agent-ready skills |
| START_HERE.md | 60-second onboarding for local repo users |
v0.84 — August 10, 2026 · The Lifecycle & End-of-Life Suite
lifecycle-play-advisor and product-lifecycle-plays diagnose where a product actually sits using seven transition questions, then pick between the three plays — extend, replace, or retire. Includes the seven replacement hazards and a risk register whose contingency column asks the question everyone skips: what is Plan B?eol-readiness-advisor (go/no-go, and it will tell you to hold) → eol-stakeholder-sequence (Legal before Finance before Sales — get the order wrong and you find the landmines after the announcement) → eol-checklist (phase-gated, an owner on every item) → eol-internal-enablement (your teams ready before customers hear) → eol-message (upgraded: three transition paths including the honest no-replacement case) → eol-process (the whole thing, six phases, including the post-EOL review everybody skips)v0.83 — July 17, 2026 · The Market Intelligence Suite
autonomous-investigation — the protocol for research that proceeds without you. Question budgets, a search-plan gate, Fact / Inference / Assumption labels on every claim, do-not-invent lists, and stable diffable schemas, so investigations can run on a schedule and you can diff this quarter against lasttam-sam-som-calculator (three entry modes, including autonomous bottom-up research) and company-intel (Executive Signal Refresh rerun pattern — Then/Now diffs and Dropped Language: what leaders stop saying is often the strongest signal)v0.82 — July 8, 2026
incoming-request-advisor (Interactive) — drop in a Slack ping, email, mandate, or escalation and get a structured breakdown that separates the literal ask from the real job-to-be-done, reads sender power and stake, and points you toward a reply. Ships with a copy/paste template so you can run it by hand too/dist — no terminal, no Releases tab. Read the plain-language README, scan the CATALOG, and download any skill or pack straight from the repo. Built for PMs who just want the skillsv0.81 — July 4, 2026
## Input section: what to bring, what happens to context you supply up front (it's used, not re-asked), and reassurance that arriving empty-handed is fine — the guided flow covers the restargument-hint autocomplete for Claude Code users; deliberately no $ARGUMENTS templating — it breaks on every other runtime and teaches the reader nothing (why)$ARGUMENTS in the bodyagent-orchestration-advisor (Interactive) — the multi-agent workflow design skill was referenced everywhere but only existed on an orphaned commit; recovered from git history and brought up to current standardsv0.80 — June 19, 2026
stakeholder-identification (Component) — comprehensive stakeholder brainstorm using allies/audiences/influencers, R/P/D marking, equity lens, and bias check; narrows to priority targetsstakeholder-mapping (Component) — two complementary grids (Power × Interest + Impact × Power); comparing outputs reveals who you're under-engaging relative to how much the product affects themstakeholder-engagement-advisor (Interactive) — per-stakeholder engagement planning via Adaptive Decision Ladder: three questions on profile, power/impact, and context deliver tailored message framing, medium, cadence, and a named next actionAll three adapted from the MITRE Innovation Toolkit via the companion repo MITRE ITK Skills — worth a bookmark if you work in discovery, facilitation, or cross-functional product strategy.
v0.79 — May 15, 2026
organic-growth-advisor — McKinsey Growth Pyramid triage for new segments, geographies, channels, or productspm-skill-creator — interactive skill for designing repo-compliant skills via guided conversation.claude-plugin/plugin.json that silently blocked Claude Code skill discoveryPM_MAX_INPUT) and path traversal protection to helper scriptsFound a gap? Have a PM framework worth formalizing? The bar is pedagogic — skills must teach the why, not just the how.
See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines, or open an issue to start a conversation.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — non-commercial use with share-alike.
Everything in this repository — every skill, template, and doc — is licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. There is no mix of licenses here.
Some skills note in their Provenance sections that they were adapted from product-manager-prompts, Dean's earlier prompt library. That repo has the same author, so there is no license conflict: a license grants permissions to other people, and a copyright holder is free to adapt and relicense their own work. Those Provenance lines are lineage — a breadcrumb back to where an idea started — not a license dependency. No third-party MIT-licensed text is incorporated anywhere in this library.
In plain terms:
The companion prompt library, product-manager-prompts, carries the same CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license as of its v2.3.0, with its own plain-language permissions (stricter on commercial use) — see its LICENSING.md, which governs that repo.
name: eol-stakeholder-sequence
argument-hint: "[product being sunset, and who already knows]"
description: "Plan who to talk to about a sunset, in what order, and what each conversation must cover. Use when an EOL decision is made and you want the landmines found before the announcement."
intent: >-
Plan the order and content of stakeholder conversations for an EOL decision. Encodes the
hard-won lesson that EOL engagement has a specific sequence — legal exposure first, financial
impact second, then revenue-facing teams, then customer-facing teams — and that getting the order
wrong means discovering landmines after the announcement instead of before.
type: component
theme: eol-transition
best_for:
- "Sequencing EOL conversations so each one informs the next"
- "Knowing what to ask for and what to commit to at every stop"
- "Finding the objection that would have blown up six months after the announcement"
scenarios:
- "We're retiring a product and I don't know who to talk to first or what to bring them"
- "Last sunset blew up because Sales had promised things we didn't know about — sequence this one properly"
estimated_time: "20-35 min"Plan the order of EOL conversations, and what each one must cover. The output is a sequenced list of stops — each with what you need from them, what you owe to them, the red flags to listen for, and what the conversation must produce.
EOL is not a broadcast. It is a series of conversations where each one informs the next, and each one surfaces something the last one missed. Sequenced well, the awkward discoveries happen in a conference room. Sequenced badly, they happen in public, after the announcement, in front of customers.
Works best with: The product being sunset and who already knows about it.
Also useful: Scale (customers, revenue, contracts), whether channel partners or regulators are involved, and any political sensitivities, strained relationships, or past surprises worth planning around.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or
an appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it
covers; don't re-ask.
Arriving empty-handed? That works too. The skill asks up to three questions — what's being sunset and who knows, how big the blast radius is, and whether there's history to plan around — then builds the sequence. Political sensitivities are optional; the sequence works without them and sharpens with them.
Example invocations:
Sequence the stakeholder conversations for retiring our legacy reporting module.Who do I talk to, in what order, about sunsetting a hardware line with 8 resellers?Talk to the people who can kill the plan before you talk to the people who have to execute it.
Each conversation should inform the next. Legal exposure first, because a contract term can end the discussion. Financial impact second, because it sizes everything downstream. Then revenue-facing teams, then customer-facing teams, then the technical teams who will carry it out.
Get this backwards — brief Support first, Legal last — and you will have told forty people about a plan that a single contract clause invalidates.
Not all EOLs play out the same. Most land in the middle:
| Level 1 — Light | Level 2 — Standard | Level 3 — Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical scope | Feature, internal tool, API | Commercial product, active customers | Revenue-critical, hardware, regulated |
| Stops | 3-4 | 7-8 | 10+ |
| Includes | Engineering, Support, affected users | + Legal, Finance, Sales, Marketing, CS, difficult customers | + Executives, Channel, Regulatory, key accounts |
| Skip unless there's a reason | Legal, Finance, Sales, Channel | Channel, Regulatory | — |
Level 2 is the default. Recommend a level, say why, then let the user move it. Never default to the heaviest sequence — a ten-stop tour for a feature deprecation burns credibility you'll want for the sunset that actually needs it.
If someone dials down, name the stop they're dropping and what it typically catches. Dropping Legal on a product with contracts is the one worth pushing back on once — then honoring their call.
Filtered by level, but the relative order holds:
Level 1+
Level 2+ (inserted ahead of the above)
Level 3+
Counterintuitive, and the stop teams skip most often. The customer who files the most tickets and pushes hardest in QBRs has, by construction, the deepest and weirdest usage of your product. They will find the integration you forgot, the contract term nobody read, and the workflow that has no equivalent in the replacement.
You can learn that from them in a scheduled call now, or from them on a public forum later.
Every stop has two directions. Skipping the second turns stakeholders into an audience:
A conversation that is all extraction gets you compliance. A conversation that runs both ways gets you the thing they weren't asked about.
Every bullet is 4 to 8 words. Sequences get read in hallways, before meetings, on phones.
Recommend from blast radius, present all three, let the user choose. If unclear, ask:
"How complex is this sunset?
Most are Standard. Which sounds like yours?"
Apply the canonical order, filtered by level. Two adjustments worth making:
For every stop, fill five fields:
Then state the output: the decision, approval, or artifact the conversation must produce. A stop with no output is a status update, not a stop.
Say which stops must be strictly sequential and why, and which can safely run in parallel. Being explicit here is what lets a team compress a ten-stop sequence into three weeks without breaking the dependency that mattered.
Close with what you assumed — who you think knows, what you think the contracts say, which relationships you think are intact.
"Where next?
eol-messageReply with a number, a combination ('1 & 3'), or your own path."
examples/sample.md — Fieldlight Classic Dispatch (SaaS, Level 2, eight stops)examples/sample-industrial.md — NFA-200 controller line (industrial, Level 3, eleven stops)Symptom: The sequence starts with a company-wide email.
Consequence: Every subsequent conversation is a negotiation with someone who found out the wrong way and is now defending their turf instead of helping you.
Fix: The announcement is the end of the internal sequence, not the beginning.
Symptom: Legal gets looped in once the plan is built, "to review."
Consequence: A contract term or regulatory obligation invalidates a plan forty people have already committed to. Now you're relitigating instead of executing.
Fix: Legal is the first Level 2+ stop. A five-minute "are there commitments here?" beats a five-week replan.
Symptom: Sales is informed of the EOL date rather than asked what they've promised.
Consequence: Field commitments that never made it into a contract surface after the announcement, from the customer's side, as accusations of bad faith.
Fix: Ask Sales explicitly: what has anyone promised about this product's future? Ask before you tell.
Symptom: The sequence covers internal functions and stops.
Consequence: Your edge cases are discovered by the people least inclined to be quiet about them.
Fix: Two or three of your hardest customers, under NDA if needed, before the public announcement. Budget for what they'll find.
Symptom: Every stop is a list of things you need. Nothing is offered.
Consequence: Stakeholders answer the questions asked and volunteer nothing. The thing that sinks you was the thing nobody thought to ask about.
Fix: Fill "what you owe them" for every stop before you hold it.
These stand on their own — none is a prerequisite for this skill, and this skill isn't a prerequisite for them. If you already chose a level elsewhere, say "Level 2" and this skill builds to it.
eol-checklist — the phase-gated operational planeol-internal-enablement — what customer-facing teams get
after these conversationseol-readiness-advisor — if the decision still needs a caseeol-message — the customer-facing announcementstakeholder-map — general power/interest mapping for non-EOL workprompts/eol-stakeholder-sequence.md in the
https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-prompts repo.
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!