复制安装命令
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
用 Codex 或 Claude 安装复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它先审查 Skill 页面再帮你安装。
复制前请先查看来源、License 和安全提示。
来源文件:README.md
Essays and writing behind this toolkit live at vexjoy.com.
AI agents skip steps.
"Looks correct" replaces running tests. "Trivial change" replaces verification. The agent confidently ships broken code because nothing structurally prevented it from skipping the work.
Harnesses have a second problem: given only a skill list, they do not route eagerly enough, or correctly enough. Good skills sit unused. So this toolkit connects the skills, agents, and workflows we want directly into the harness, automatically. You don't have to understand what is here. Say what you want in plain English and you get all the value we have put into it: the right specialist with the right methodology, behind gates that demand exit codes, not assertions.
44 domain agents, 122 workflow skills, 78 hooks, 136 scripts. Agents carry knowledge, skills enforce methodology, hooks block incomplete work, scripts handle determinism.
Works across Claude Code (/do), Codex ($do), Factory (/do), Reasonix (/do).
$ claude
> /do debug this Go test
Routing: go-engineer + systematic-debugging
Phase 1/4: Reproduce: running test, capturing failure...
Phase 2/4: Hypothesize: 3 candidates from stack trace...
Phase 3/4: Verify: isolated root cause in connection pool timeout
Phase 4/4: Fix: patch applied, test passing, PR opened
✓ Delivered: PR #847, fix connection pool timeout in health check
The router reads intent, picks a Go agent paired with a debugging skill, and runs the full lifecycle. You typed one sentence. The system did the rest.
ROUTE PLAN EXECUTE VERIFY DELIVER RECORD
┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐
│ /do │───▶│ Task │───▶│Agent │───▶│Tests │───▶│ PR │───▶│Route │
│Router│ │ Plan │ │+Skill│ │Gates │ │Branch│ │Result│
└──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘
This is the single thing that separates it from "agent with a system prompt."
| Agent Says | What Happens |
|---|---|
| "Code looks correct, skip tests" | Exit gate requires test output. Blocked. |
| "Trivial change, no verification" | Hook blocks completion without evidence. |
| "Similar to before" | Skill demands case-specific proof. |
| "User is in a hurry" | Protocol overrides time pressure. |
| "I'm confident" | Gate demands exit code, not assertion. |
Hooks fire automatically. Gates block completion. Skills encode counter-arguments at every skip-worthy step. The agent verifies or it doesn't finish.
For what I do, the difference is enormous. If you're doing simple single-file edits, maybe less so.
The same routing serves knowledge work. The content engine researches, drafts in a calibrated voice, validates against 397 AI patterns, and repurposes finished pieces for each platform. /html turns any request into a single self-contained HTML file: report, slide deck, prototype, data viz, diagram. Non-engineers who try the toolkit consistently name the HTML artifacts as the thing they love. No code, no setup beyond the installer.
Changes to the toolkit itself ship with evidence. New skills get blind A/B tests against a no-skill baseline before merge. Routing and writing-standard decisions carry measured verdicts; PHILOSOPHY.md cites the numbers. Experiments that lost go into the negative-results registry, what-didnt-work.md; the registry now covers routing reversals, unvalidated A/B citations, and disabled lint rules alongside the original program refutations.
The automated nightly evolution loop (/evolve, writes to evolution-reports/) ran regularly through mid-May 2026. It is currently dormant; recent evidence has come from manual PRs instead.
git clone https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent.git ~/vexjoy-agent
cd ~/vexjoy-agent
./install.sh
Links into ~/.claude/ and mirrors into ~/.codex/, ~/.factory/, ~/.reasonix/ — each mirror only when that runtime is detected (its command on PATH or its home dir already exists). The installer asks symlink (live updates via git pull) or copy (stable snapshot).
Want only part of the toolkit? Run ./install.sh --configure to pick which skills, agents, and hooks install, or copy .local.example/profile.yaml to .local/profile.yaml and edit. No profile file = full install, unchanged behavior. Credit: @thomasvan. Details: .local.example/README.md.
| CLI | Entry Point |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | /do |
| Codex | $do |
| Factory | /do |
| Reasonix | /do |
Full setup: docs/start-here.md
Mirrors agents, skills, and supported hooks into ~/.codex/. The original six-hook allowlist was correct for Codex v0.114, when tool hooks only intercepted Bash. Current support requires Codex v0.144.1+ and classifies the 74 Claude hook registrations as 26 native, 35 adapter-backed, and 13 unsupported (61 supported). These are registration counts, not unique hook files. The installer also preserves explicit per-subagent model routing for GPT-5.6 Sol by setting the MultiAgent V2 compatibility keys documented in openai/codex#31814.
Codex now exposes apply_patch to tool hooks. VexJoy's adapter converts each patch operation into the Write/Edit payload expected by existing guards, but it cannot intercept writes performed through unified_exec, unmatched MCP tools, WebSearch, or other unsupported tool paths. PreCompact and Stop adapters also receive less telemetry than Claude Code: Codex does not provide Claude's conversation_history or session_data. This is expanded compatibility, not full Claude parity.
After install or any hook-definition change, run /hooks in Codex and review the new definitions before trusting them. Codex hash-trusts hook commands and skips changed, unreviewed definitions.
Gemini CLI support removed (deprecated upstream, transitioned to Antigravity CLI); Antigravity support pending CLI maturity. Per Google's transition announcement, Gemini CLI stops serving requests on 2026-06-18 for Google AI Pro / Ultra and free Gemini Code Assist for individuals. Gemini API integrations (image-gen backends, sprite pipeline, GEMINI_API_KEY) are unaffected and stay in the toolkit.
If a prior install mirrored into ~/.gemini/, remove the stale mirrors with:
rm -rf ~/.gemini/skills ~/.gemini/agents ~/.gemini/hooks ~/.gemini/scripts ~/.gemini/antigravity/plugins/vexjoy-agent
Mirrors agents (as "droids"), skills, and all hooks into ~/.factory/. Hook config merges into ~/.factory/settings.json with paths rewritten.
Mirrors skills, scripts, and the allowlisted hooks (scripts/reasonix-hooks-allowlist.txt) into ~/.reasonix/ (no agent or custom-command surface, so neither is installed; the /do router rides in as a skill). Reasonix fires only 4 events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, UserPromptSubmit, Stop), so only hooks for those events are allowlisted. Hook config is written to the hooks key of ~/.reasonix/settings.json in Reasonix's native flat shape (one entry per hook, match regex over the tool name); the generator builds absolute python3 commands, so no path rewrite is applied. MCP/model/permissions in ~/.reasonix/config.json are user-owned and left untouched.
The toolkit supplies its own routing, domain knowledge, methodology, and enforcement. The default system prompt duplicates most of that.
claude --system-prompt "."
Strips built-in tool-use instructions. The toolkit's agents, skills, hooks, and CLAUDE.md provide equivalent coverage.
| Layer | Count | Does |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | 44 | Domain knowledge: idiom tables, failure mode catalogs, error-to-fix mappings |
| Skills | 122 | Phased methodology with gates. Can't skip steps. Each phase has exit criteria requiring evidence. |
| Hooks | 78 | Fire on lifecycle events. Block incomplete work. Zero LLM cost. |
| Scripts | 136 | Determinism: test runners, linters, validators. No LLM judgment. |
Full skill catalog: docs/skills.md.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SKILL.md │
│ ┌─ Frontmatter ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ triggers, pairs_with, success-criteria │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ Reference Loading Table (conditional imports) │
│ Phased Instructions (numbered, with gates) │
│ Verification (evidence requirements) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
A game built entirely by Claude Code using these agents, skills, and pipelines:
I just want to use it Install, learn /do, done.
I do knowledge work Writing, research, data analysis, moderation, HTML artifacts. No code.
I'm a developer Architecture, extension points, adding agents and skills.
I'm an AI power user Routing tables, pipelines, hooks, telemetry DB.
I'm an AI agent Machine-dense inventory. Tables, paths, schemas.
I'm on LinkedIn 🚀 Thought leadership. Agree? 👇
Full design philosophy: PHILOSOPHY.md
One report-only script surfaces upkeep work; it prints a digest and never edits, deletes, or blocks.
python3 scripts/stale-skill-scan.py --top 20 ranks stale skills and agents as pruning candidates. Run it quarterly; see docs/deprecation-template.md.Scheduled work follows the same boundary as everything else: judgment uses agents; repeatable plumbing uses scripts.
| Need | Use |
|---|---|
| Run a deterministic command on a schedule | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with runner: "command" |
| Run an agent judgment on a schedule, webhook, or file change | scripts/agent-scheduler.py with the default runner: "claude" |
| Install or remove a user crontab entry safely | scripts/crontab-manager.py |
| Audit shell cron reliability | cron-automation |
| Keep one interactive objective moving until criteria verify | objective-loop |
See CONTRIBUTING.md.
MIT. See LICENSE.
name: worktree-agent
promoted_to: do
description: "Mandatory rules for agents in git worktree isolation."
user-invocable: false
context: fork
tags: [worktree, isolation, parallel, agent]
routing:
triggers:
- "worktree agent"
- "git worktree"
- "git worktree rules"
- "isolated agent"
category: git-workflowMandatory rules for any agent dispatched with isolation: "worktree".
On start, run pwd. Your path MUST contain .claude/worktrees/.
If your CWD is the main repo path, STOP and report the error.
git checkout -b <branch-name>
Never commit on the default worktree-agent-* branch. Create your feature branch FIRST.
If git checkout -b <branch-name> fails with "a branch named X already exists":
# Option A: the branch has no commits beyond main — safe to reset and reuse
git branch -D <branch-name>
git checkout -b <branch-name>
# Option B: the branch is checked out in another active worktree — use a unique name
git checkout -b <branch-name>-2 # or append timestamp: $(date +%s)
If git checkout -b <branch-name> fails with "X is already used by worktree at Y":
# Branch is live in another worktree — use a unique suffix
git checkout -b <branch-name>-$(date +%s)
To update a branch held by another worktree (e.g. an existing PR branch): work detached from origin/<branch> and push with git push origin HEAD:<branch>. gh pr merge's post-merge local-checkout errors are harmless.
Never hardcode absolute paths from the main repo. Use $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/path.
Exception: Reading gitignored ADR files requires the main repo absolute path.
Keep planning inline instead of creating task_plan.md. If the auto-plan hook fires, continue with the current task and keep your attention on implementation.
git add path/to/specific/file.py
Never git add ., git add -A, or git add --all. Verify with git diff --cached --stat.
Never write to paths outside your worktree directory. Never run git checkout in the main repo.
Use the commit message specified in your prompt. No attribution lines.
For any Python code changes, run both checks before pushing or creating a PR:
ruff check . --config pyproject.toml
ruff format --check . --config pyproject.toml
Running only ruff check misses formatting violations. The Tests / lint CI job runs both — if you skip ruff format --check, the PR will fail CI and cannot merge due to branch protection.
Run the preflight script at the start of any worktree task to confirm clean state:
bash scripts/worktree-preflight.sh <intended-branch-name>
If it exits 1, fix the reported issue before proceeding.
The dispatcher runs this before each implementation worktree:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/process/worktree-agent/scripts/worktree_capacity.py \
--repo "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" --strict
The JSON report has three states:
| State | Dispatcher action |
|---|---|
ready (<80% used) | Create the one implementation checkout for the candidate. |
cleanup-soon (80–<85%) | Reclaim accepted clean checkouts before adding another. Use root read-only review work where possible. |
blocked (≥85%) | Integrate, deploy, verify, or reclaim; create no new checkout. |
The report lists clean candidates only. The dispatcher confirms their task is inactive before removal because Git cleanliness alone does not prove that fact.
| Task | Checkout policy |
|---|---|
| Source implementation or repair | One writable task worktree, reused through review corrections. |
| Code review, test-plan review, or read-only investigation | Read the candidate through git diff or git show from the repository root; allocate no checkout. |
| Large repository implementation | Create a sparse worktree containing declared source/test/config scopes; include whole-repository content only when the task requires it. |
For a sparse implementation checkout:
git worktree add --no-checkout <worktree-path> -b <branch> <base-sha>
git -C <worktree-path> sparse-checkout init --no-cone
git -C <worktree-path> sparse-checkout set --no-cone <declared-path>...
git -C <worktree-path> checkout
Record any full-checkout reason in the dispatch handoff.
After integration or a PR merge, the dispatcher first confirms that the task is inactive and the checkout is clean, then runs:
git worktree remove -- <accepted-worktree-path>
bash scripts/worktree-cleanup.sh --force
git worktree remove frees the materialized checkout while preserving its branch for recovery. The cleanup script then prunes stale .git/worktrees entries and removes merged harness branches.
| Failure | Rule | Without It |
|---|---|---|
| Agent edits main repo files | 1, 6 | Changes leak to main, get stashed/lost |
| Context wasted on task_plan.md | 4 | Implementation budget consumed by planning |
| Commit on wrong branch | 2 | Orchestrator merges wrong content |
| PR has changes from 2 ADRs | 5, 6 | Cross-contamination between agents |
| Branch locked by worktree | 2 | Fatal error on checkout |
| PR fails CI on format | 8 | Merge blocked; ruff format --check was skipped |
| New task fails to create worktree | 9 | Branch name collision from prior stale run |
评论 (0)
暂无评论,成为第一个评论者吧!